IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05627680.html

The Power of Procedures. the Managerialization and Bureaucratization of Global Health Policies: The Example of the Global Fund in West and Central Africa
[Le pouvoir des procédures. Les politiques de santé mondiale entre managérialisation et bureaucratisation : l’exemple du Fonds mondial en Afrique de l’Ouest et du centre]

Author

Listed:
  • Stéphanie Tchiombiano

    (UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

  • Olivier Nay

    (UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, SIPA - Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs, CESSP - Centre européen de sociologie et de science politique - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Fred Eboko

    (Ceped - UMR 196 - Centre Population et Développement - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - UPCité - Université Paris Cité - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, IRD [Ile-de-France] - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement)

Abstract

This article analyzes contemporary transformations in international public action through the case of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria in West and Central Africa. It focuses in particular on the effects of four core principles promoted by the Global Fund: partnership, country ownership, results-based financing, and transparency. Although these mechanisms are presented as instruments of decentralization, accountability, and greater openness in public action, they also contribute to the standardization of practices, the formalization of procedures, and tighter control over national actors. The article shows that mechanisms associated with New Public Management do not lead to a reduction in bureaucracy, but rather to its reconfiguration. Evaluation procedures, performance indicators, contractual arrangements, and reporting requirements strongly structure the design and implementation of funded policies. At the same time, the institutionalization of participatory mechanisms reshapes relations among public administrations, international donors, and civil society actors. The case of the Global Fund thus highlights the emergence of a form of transnational bureaucracy based on managerial instruments, standardized procedures, and new forms of governing at a distance.

Suggested Citation

  • Stéphanie Tchiombiano & Olivier Nay & Fred Eboko, 2018. "The Power of Procedures. the Managerialization and Bureaucratization of Global Health Policies: The Example of the Global Fund in West and Central Africa [Le pouvoir des procédures. Les politiques de santé mondiale entre managérialisation et burea," Post-Print hal-05627680, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05627680
    DOI: 10.3917/kart.grego.2018.01.0107
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05627680v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05627680v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3917/kart.grego.2018.01.0107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05627680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.