IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05624548.html

From e-compliance to smart taxation: Institutional pressures, digital trust, and SME adoption of AI-based tax tools in Morocco
[De l'e-conformité à la fiscalité intelligente : Pressions institutionnelles, confiance numérique et adoption des outils fiscaux fondés sur l'IA par les PME au Maroc]

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Amine Errochdi

    (Laboratoire de Recherche en Économie et Management des Organisations Ecole National de Commerce et de Gestion Béni Mellal,Université Sultane Moulay Slimane Béni Mellal)

  • Zainab Saf

    (Laboratoire de Recherche en Économie et Management des Organisations Ecole National de Commerce et de Gestion Béni MellalUniversitéSultane Moulay Slimane Béni Mellal)

  • Abdellatif Maniali

    (Laboratoire de Recherche en Économie et Management des Organisations Ecole National de Commerce et de Gestion Béni MellalUniversitéSultane Moulay Slimane Béni Mellal)

Abstract

This article explores the dynamics of advanced tax digitalization adoption, including artificial intelligence–enabled systems, by Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) in the context of an emerging economy. It examines how institutional pressures, organizational capabilities, and digital trust shape and moderate the process through which these firms appropriate such technologies.Methodologically, the research follows an interpretivist qualitative approach based on 24 semi-structured interviews conducted in Morocco, including 18 SME owners/managers and 6 tax and digitalization experts. The dataset is analysed using the Gioia data structure, which enables the systematic emergence of first-order concepts, second-order themes, and aggregate dimensions, thereby providing a nuanced understanding of the underlying adoption logics.The findings show that the adoption of AI-driven tax solutions by SMEs unfolds as a coercive and reactive process, primarily driven by regulatory mandates rather than strategic innovation intent. The perception of AI in taxation is strongly marked by fear of algorithmic opacity, frequently described as a "black box," which undermines perceived transparency and fairness. This perception is exacerbated by a structural deficit of internal resources and skills (liabilityof smallness) and by a pervasive distrust of the tax administration's motives, particularly in terms of control and sanctioning power. As a result, SMEs tend to deploy façade compliance strategies, such as symbolic decoupling and extensive outsourcing of fiscal tasks, which limit genuine learning and prevent any deeper strategic transformation.As an original contribution, the article proposes a theoretical extension of the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework tailored to coercive institutional settings by introducing Digital Institutional Trust as a mediating variable between environmental pressures and actual appropriation of digital tax tools. It also highlights the urgent need to establish forms of "digital procedural justice" capable of enhancing transparency, explainability, and perceived fairness in AI-driven tax systems, thereby fostering more substantive and sustainable adoption among SMEs in emerging economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Amine Errochdi & Zainab Saf & Abdellatif Maniali, 2026. "From e-compliance to smart taxation: Institutional pressures, digital trust, and SME adoption of AI-based tax tools in Morocco [De l'e-conformité à la fiscalité intelligente : Pressions institutionnelles, confiance numérique et adoption des outils," Post-Print hal-05624548, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05624548
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19002953
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05624548v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05624548v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.19002953?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05624548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.