IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05617292.html

Employee competences for responsible generative AI use at work: a personal resource perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Singh Dhruv Pratap

    (NEOMA - Neoma Business School)

  • Anuragini Shirish

    (LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], IMT-BS - TIM - Département Technologies, Information & Management - TEM - Télécom Ecole de Management - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], Smart BIS - Smart Business Information Systems - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • Helena González-Gómez

    (NEOMA - Neoma Business School)

  • Shiva Taghavi

    (NEOMA - Neoma Business School)

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is becoming embedded in everyday work, positioning responsible GenAI use as a defining employee competence for the future of HRM. However, organisations are adopting these tools far faster than employees are developing the competence to use them responsibly, and a readiness gap is already visible in high-profile GenAI failures and costly ethical missteps. Despite this urgency, HRM lacks a validated construct for assessing how employees engage with GenAI in informed, ethical, adaptive, functional, and socially appropriate ways. We address this need by conceptualising Responsible GenAI Competence (RGAIC) as a second-order construct with five dimensions: cognitive, functional, social, meta, and ethical. We followed a theory-driven, multi-phase scale development process combining expert assessment, psychometric validation, and a time-lagged field study. The results establish RGAIC as a robust, multidimensional personal resource shaped by Ability-enhancing HR Practices (AeHRPs) for GenAI training and predictive of GenAI-enabled job engagement. The construct advances HRM theory by foregrounding employee–GenAI interaction as a core domain of inquiry. For practitioners, it enables organisations to assess readiness, anticipate competence gaps, design targeted GenAI training, and build cultures of responsibility aligned with emerging regulatory and ethical standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Singh Dhruv Pratap & Anuragini Shirish & Helena González-Gómez & Shiva Taghavi, 2026. "Employee competences for responsible generative AI use at work: a personal resource perspective," Post-Print hal-05617292, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05617292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05617292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.