IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05616979.html

Quelle méthodologie de la recherche à l'ère de l’IA ?

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine de la Fouchardiere

    (LIRSA - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de recherche en sciences de l'action - Cnam - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [Cnam])

Abstract

What research methodology for the AI era? A case study incorporating reflective practice and peer review The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence tools in higher education is profoundly transforming students' learning strategies, as well as teaching practices. In the context of supervising Master's research dissertations, these developments raise questions regarding the role of AI in academic output, the development of critical thinking, and the assessment of skills. This paper presents feedback from an experiment conducted with two groups of students: one studying entirely online, the other in person. The aim was to explore how reflective practice and peer assessment could help to strengthen students' engagement and the quality of their research process. The programme is based on several elements: several assignments marking the progress of the dissertation, formative assessments structured using the ChallengeMe platform, and the keeping of a reflective logbook enabling students to document their actions, explain their choices and their use of AI, and demonstrate critical perspective. A comparative analysis of the two groups of students give insights on contributions of AI, peer dynamics and reflexivity, leading to more transparent research outcomes and suggestions for improving support methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine de la Fouchardiere, 2026. "Quelle méthodologie de la recherche à l'ère de l’IA ?," Post-Print hal-05616979, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05616979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05616979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.