Author
Listed:
- Oscar Chiwira
(Faculty of Commerce, BA ISAGO University, Private Bag 149, Suite #268, KgaleView PostNet, Gaborone, Botswana.)
- Edson Kambeu
(Department of Business Management, Faculty of Commerce, BA ISAGO University, Private Bag F328, Francistown, Botswana.)
Abstract
Background: Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is broadly defined as capital flows resulting from the behaviour of multinational companies. Several studies have found the impact of FDI on economic growth to be insignificant. Despite the observed economic growth in Botswana, there is limited empirical evidence examining the specific impact of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows on this growth. Aims: The study examines the relationship between FDI and economic growth using yearly time series data for the period 1980 to 2012. Methodology: A Multi-model econometric study was conducted to determine the true impact of FDI on economic growth in Botswana. The study uses the Augmented Dickey-Fuller and the Phillips-Perron test to test the stationarity of the variables. Johansen and Juselius' cointegration test was used to test for cointegration. Finally, the study uses the Granger causality test to determine whether FDI influences economic growth. Findings: FDI is regarded as an important driver of economic growth, but empirical evidence reveals that the relationship is not straightforward. Using the Johansen cointegration test applied to a dynamic model, the study found that there is a long-term relationship between FDI and economic growth in Botswana. However, using the Granger causality tests, we were not able to confirm whether it is the FDI that is spurring economic growth or it is economic growth that is promoting FDI inflows. Conclusion: Botswana should therefore continue to create conditions that attract FDI in order to influence economic growth. Further research could use time series models like the vector autoregression model (VAR) to test the linear relationship between FDI and economic growth, including control variables like investment (as a percentage of GDP) and human capital formation.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05611757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.