Author
Listed:
- Bamenda Philip Chinda
(Department of Accounting, Adamawa State University, Mubi, Nigeria.)
- Benedict Hirki Joseph
(Department of Taxation, Adamawa State University, Mubi, Nigeria.)
Abstract
This study examined the moderating effect of Audit Committee Independence (ACI) on the relationship between key audit firm attributes Auditor Independence (AFI), Audit Fees (AFE), and Audit Partner Rotation (APR) and Audit Quality (ACQ) among listed non-service companies in Nigeria. Drawing upon Agency, Stakeholder, and Resource Dependence Theories, the research adopts a correlational design using panel data from 53 companies covering the period 2012–2022. Audit quality is proxied by accrual quality, while ACI is modelled as a moderating variable to test its capacity to strengthen audit governance relationships. Data were analysed using Feasible Generalised Least Squares (FGLS) and Panel-Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE) to control for heteroskedasticity and contemporaneous correlation. Empirical findings reveal that auditor independence significantly and negatively influences accruals, implying improved audit quality, whereas audit fees exert a positive and significant effect, indicating potential impairment of auditor objectivity due to economic dependence. Audit partner rotation shows a weak and statistically insignificant relationship with audit quality. The inclusion of ACI as a moderator amplifies the positive effect of auditor independence but does not materially alter the effects of audit fees and partner rotation. The study concludes that audit quality in Nigeria's non-service companies is primarily driven by auditor independence and strengthened further through robust and independent audit committees. It recommends that regulators, such as the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria and the Securities and Exchange Commission, reinforce compliance with the Nigerian Code of Corporate Governance (2018) to enhance committee independence, transparency in audit fee disclosure, and balanced partner rotation cycles. The study contributes to the global discourse on audit governance and aligns with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 8, 9, 12, and 16, which advocate for decent work, industrial innovation, responsible reporting, and strong institutions.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05603174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.