IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05601510.html

Public and private support of the AgriTech : what rationale for what innovation pathway ? A multiple case study in France and Chile

Author

Listed:
  • Éléonore Schnebelin

    (AGIR - AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - EI Purpan - Ecole d'Ingénieurs de Purpan - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse)

  • Daniel Gaitán-Cremaschi

    (Universidad de Talca)

  • Laurens Klerkx

    (WUR - Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen])

  • Pierre Labarthe

    (AGIR - AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - EI Purpan - Ecole d'Ingénieurs de Purpan - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse)

Abstract

Both public and private actors are increasingly using a diversity of support instruments to foster AgriTech innovation, including a growing interest in the agrifood sector from venture capital and private equity (Lajoie-O'Malley et al., 2020; Sippel and Dolinga, 2023). This support is not only legitimized by the classic rationale of the effect of innovation on economic efficiency and the need for support due to uncertain returns on investment - but also by the socio-ecological effects that these technological developments would enable (Martin and Schnebelin, 2024). Despite this evolution and the growing influence of private funding (Glenna et al., 2015), the AgriTech ecosystems, and their impact on the agricultural innovation system, remain poorly studied (Klerkx and Villalobos, 2024). Who supports AgTech development, what rationales underpin support instruments and how hybrid public and private arrangements configure who and what is supported ? At the crossroad of literature on the agricultural innovation system and entrepreneurial and innovation ecosystems, our research aims to decipher how the development of private venture capital, alongside new innovation support rationales, shape innovation pathways in the agrifood sector. To address these aims, we present a comparative study of AgriTech innovation ecosystems in France and Chile. While these two countries offer different institutional context, they are both very dynamic in terms of AgriTech development. Through an analysis of the CrunchBase database and interviews with key public and private stakeholders of AgriTech innovation ecosystems, we describe the landscape of AgriTech support services. We characterize these instruments according to their providers, beneficiaries and means (Audretsch et al., 2020), as well as their objectives and rationales (Kerr et al., 2017; Laranja et al., 2008). The results highlight the multi-level, multi-actor and multi-instrument ecosystem of innovation support instruments for AgTech in France and Chile. We observe a strong entanglement of public and private support. Most instruments provide a diversity of resources such as funds, knowledge, network, legal expertise…. While they incorporate "mission-oriented" dimensions, they have few processes to evaluate, support and foster these missions. Despite similarities, the instruments refer to different rationales and objectives. These results will enable us to discuss the evolution of agricultural innovation policies within a neoliberal context and a regime of entrepreneurial innovation (« the Silicon Valley model of innovation »).

Suggested Citation

  • Éléonore Schnebelin & Daniel Gaitán-Cremaschi & Laurens Klerkx & Pierre Labarthe, 2026. "Public and private support of the AgriTech : what rationale for what innovation pathway ? A multiple case study in France and Chile," Post-Print hal-05601510, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05601510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05601510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.