Author
Listed:
- Tidiani Sidibe
(UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia)
- Eric Paget-Blanc
(LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne)
Abstract
This paper examines the impact of Preferred Creditor Status (PCS) on the credit risk profile of Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs). PCS implies that, in situations of sovereign financial distress, borrowing countries prioritize debt service to MDBs over other public and private creditors. While PCS is widely acknowledged in policy discussions, empirical evidence on its quantitative effects on credit risk remains limited. Using data on sovereign defaults over the period 1992–2022, this study compares the credit performance of MDBs with that of other public creditors and commercial banks. We document that default rates on MDB sovereign loans are significantly lower than those observed for other creditors. Moreover, MDBs exhibit substantially lower non‑performing loan (NPL) ratios and loan loss provisioning levels than commercial banks. Based on a comparative panel dataset covering 20 MDBs and 20 commercial banks, we show that the observed differences in default rates, NPLs, and provisioning are directly attributable to Preferred Creditor Status. Our results indicate that PCS improves the credit quality of MDBs' sovereign loan portfolios, reduces expected credit losses, and lowers the overall cost of risk. By providing the first empirical assessment linking PCS to observed credit outcomes, this paper contributes to the literature on sovereign risk, development finance, and bank risk management. The findings highlight PCS as a core pillar of the MDB business model, enabling these institutions to provide long‑term financing for sustainable development at lower interest rates than commercial lenders.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05601202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.