IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05563838.html

“Why our voices don’t count”:The employment experiences of neurodivergent employees through a double empathy lens

Author

Listed:
  • S. Hennekam

    (Audencia Business School)

  • F. Follmer

Abstract

This article aims to understand the employment experiences of neurodivergent employees through the lens of the double empathy problem. We draw on 25 semi-structured interviews with neurodivergent workers in France and used a grounded theory approach to analyze the data. The findings demonstrate that the stigma associated with neurodivergence coupled with the double empathy problem can influence neurodivergent employees to engage in camouflaging as a means of avoiding these negative reactions from others. This, in turn, leads to reduced well-being and a perceived lack of organizational support on behalf of neurodivergent employees. Ultimately, this cycle can diminish the voices of neurodivergent employees as they feel misunderstood, mistreated, and stigmatized, which reduces their confidence and efficacy in voicing their ideas. Additionally, organizations may overlook the unique capabilities and strengths of this population, failing to seek out or encourage their voices to be heard. This study fills gaps in the literature by studying the double empathy problem in a workplace context and by showing that the double empathy problem can be extended beyond individuals with autism to explain (mis)communication between neurotypical and neurodivergent employees. The findings further underscore how it may unintentionally maintain and reinforce neurotypical hegemony and privilege in organizations as it positions neurodivergent individuals as dysfunctional and inferior.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Hennekam & F. Follmer, 2026. "“Why our voices don’t count”:The employment experiences of neurodivergent employees through a double empathy lens," Post-Print hal-05563838, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05563838
    DOI: 10.1177/13505084241295747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05563838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.