IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05563835.html

Does speculation in futures markets improve commodity hedging decisions?

Author

Listed:
  • A. Fernandez-Perez
  • A.-M. Fuertes
  • J. Miffre

    (Audencia Business School)

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of traditional versus selective hedging strategies in commodity futures markets. Traditional hedging aims solely to reduce spot price risk, while selective hedging also seeks to enhance returns by predicting movements in commodity futures prices. We construct selective hedges using a range of forecasting techniques, from simple historical averages to advanced machine learning models, and evaluate their performance based on the expected mean-variance utility of hedge portfolio returns. Out-of-sample results for 24 commodities do not favor selective hedging over traditional hedging, as the former increases risk without delivering additional returns. These findings are robust across various hedge reformulations, expanding estimation windows, and rebalancing frequencies.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Fernandez-Perez & A.-M. Fuertes & J. Miffre, 2026. "Does speculation in futures markets improve commodity hedging decisions?," Post-Print hal-05563835, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05563835
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2024.04940
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05563835v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05563835v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2024.04940?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05563835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.