IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05551921.html

Aligner de meilleures approches ESG sur les principes directeurs des Nations unies (PDNU)

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Favreau

    (Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie = EM Normandie Business School)

  • Marine Bastiege

    (Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie = EM Normandie Business School)

Abstract

The OECD (2022) and the UNEP (2023) have listed the taxonomies that now provide a framework for ESG approaches. All the taxonomies that propose aligning ESG practices with the UNGPs refer to the mechanisms of the European Green Deal. In this approach, each "eligible economic activity" in a taxonomy is considered to be "sustainable," and therefore financed as such, if three criteria are met. The third of these criteria (the "minimum safeguards") concerns the application of the UNGPs. In concrete terms, the independent third party responsible for auditing companies' management reports will now have to verify, firstly, that the company can demonstrate that the six steps of the UNGPs are integrated into their processes in accordance with OECD recommendations (OECD 2018, 24–40), and secondly, that the company is not currently responsible for serious violations identified by OECD National Contact Points (NCPs). The absence of reliable information on a company's activities demonstrates non-compliance with first due diligence. The existence of recommendations from an OECD NCP concluding that the company is responsible for serious human rights violations demonstrates non-compliance with second due diligence. These clear criteria, which are already in force, could be reiterated, and the authorities responsible for supervision could benefit from support from the OECD in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Favreau & Marine Bastiege, 2023. "Aligner de meilleures approches ESG sur les principes directeurs des Nations unies (PDNU)," Post-Print hal-05551921, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05551921
    DOI: 10.1684/pmp.0033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05551921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.