IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05547426.html

Remote monitoring system for older adults at risk for complications: a scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Israa Salma

    (CRG I3 - Centre de Recherche en Gestion I3 - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Damien Testa

    (EPOCA - EPOCA U&I)

  • Jacky-Vivien Mpoy

    (CRG I3 - Centre de Recherche en Gestion I3 - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Joel Perez-Torrents

    (CRG I3 - Centre de Recherche en Gestion I3 - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Jean-Malo Rehault

    (CRG I3 - Centre de Recherche en Gestion I3 - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Elise Cabanes

    (EPOCA - EPOCA U&I)

  • E. Minvielle

    (CRG I3 - Centre de Recherche en Gestion I3 - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Introduction: Aging populations and the increasing incidence of chronic diseases are placing additional pressure on healthcare systems. Remote monitoring systems (RMS) have emerged as a solution for improving remote healthcare efficiency and monitoring complex elderly patients. However, telemonitoring services in elderly care are still in their infancy, and their effectiveness remains unproven, with the potential for context-dependent variability. To bridge this gap, we conducted a scoping review to understand the current state of RMSs for elderly individuals at risk for complications, and their potential impact on healthcare service use, elderly's quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Methods: Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, data were gathered from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using predefined keywords, from 2010 onwards. Only English peer-reviewed studies that met the eligibility criteria were retained. Results: A total of 1,576 articles were initially identified. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 47 articles were eligible for full-text assessment. Of these, 18 articles were included in the final analysis. Multiple RMSs have been identified and used for elderly patients with complex chronic conditions and a high risk of complications. Such systems typically involve telemonitoring devices, integrated or not with health questionnaires, supported by an automated alert system led by a healthcare professional, usually a nurse, who collaborates with different healthcare structures. The evaluation of RMSs effectiveness was primarily based on health service utilization—particularly hospitalization, emergency room visits and length of hospital stay—followed by quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Our findings support the promising impact of RMSs on reducing hospitalization for at-risk elderly individuals, especially the unplanned hospitalization, improving quality of life, and its cost-effectiveness. Conclusion: This review outlines multiple RMSs used for elderly individuals at risk for complications. Although the effectiveness of RMSs may depend on the content and level of responsiveness, our review underscores the necessity for further empirical research into telemonitoring interventions to fully understand their impact on elderly health outcomes and healthcare systems resources

Suggested Citation

  • Israa Salma & Damien Testa & Jacky-Vivien Mpoy & Joel Perez-Torrents & Jean-Malo Rehault & Elise Cabanes & E. Minvielle, 2025. "Remote monitoring system for older adults at risk for complications: a scoping review," Post-Print hal-05547426, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05547426
    DOI: 10.1186/s12877-025-06385-8
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05547426v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05547426v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s12877-025-06385-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05547426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.