IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05531898.html

OM Forum-Barriers to Implementing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Programs in Supply Chains: Lessons from Comparing Public and Private Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Timofey Shalpegin

    (Prince Mohammad Bin Salman College of Business and Entrepreneurship (Saudi Arabia, Makkah) - MBSC)

  • Tyson R. Browning

    (TCU - Texas Christian University)

  • Ajay Kumar

    (EM - EMLyon Business School)

Abstract

Problem definition: This OM Forum article explores the barriers hindering the implementation of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs in supply chains by analyzing the DEI performance of publicly traded and privately held companies. Whereas the importance of DEI in supply chain management is widely acknowledged, publicly traded and privately held companies exhibit a notable gap in achieving DEI goals. Methodology/results: This article explores the factors that enabled publicly traded companies to be relatively more successful with DEI implementation and provides insights into how privately held companies can improve their DEI performance. We highlight the role of transparency in driving positive DEI change in publicly traded companies, which are also more likely to benefit from DEI initiatives because of their greater access to the resources required for implementation and a higher degree of customization. We describe additional barriers to DEI implementation, by which the differences between company types are less certain. These barriers include unawareness of or skepticism about the benefits of DEI programs in supply chains, internal opposition from advantaged groups, and the geographical scope of operations. Managerial implications: By addressing these barriers, privately held companies can create more inclusive and equitable supply chains that benefit all stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Timofey Shalpegin & Tyson R. Browning & Ajay Kumar, 2025. "OM Forum-Barriers to Implementing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Programs in Supply Chains: Lessons from Comparing Public and Private Firms," Post-Print hal-05531898, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05531898
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2023.0621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05531898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.