IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05521426.html

Validating tourism modeling with real data

Author

Listed:
  • Massimiliano Ferrara

    (Universita Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria [Reggio Calabria])

  • Wassili Lasarov

    (Audencia Business School)

  • Giampaolo Viglia

    (University of Portsmouth)

Abstract

The framework recently proposed by Nieto-García et al. (2023) presents a provocative critique of tourism research, identifying "researcher myopia" as a systematic failure to measure actual behavior. This analysis draws empirical support from the MONTUR project (Alderighi et al., 2025) (Real-time monitoring and forecasting of tourist flows in Aosta Valley), a multi-year behavioral monitoring initiative that collected optical vehicle detection data from 14 sensor portals across major transportation corridors in the Aosta Valley region of Italy. The system recorded 41 million individual vehicle passages over three calendar years (January 2021–December 2023), classifying each passage into seven behavioral categories based on observed visit frequency patterns. Following the methodological checklist for tourism researchers proposed by Nieto-García et al. (2023), this analysis addresses their call to operationalize behavioral measurement by: (1) defining observable outcomes rather than stated intentions as the dependent variable; (2) employing validated sensor technology for continuous measurement; and (3) comparing multiple analytical approaches to identify optimal forecasting methods. Machine learning models applied to this dataset achieved quantifiable forecasting accuracy that can be compared across algorithms and validated against subsequent observed behavior. Tourism professionals often encounter a troubling pattern: models that demonstrate strong theoretical foundations and statistical validation in controlled settings often underperform when confronted with real-world complexity, seasonality, disruptions, and data heterogeneity. The problem is not that theory is weak, but rather that the pathway from elegant theoretical mechanisms to reliable forecasting tools remains underdeveloped. This commentary is directly informed by the conceptual framework advanced by Nieto-García et al. (2023). Their critique of "researcher myopia" had a concrete methodological impact on the present study by motivating the exclusive use of observed behavioral data rather than stated intentions. In line with their recommendations, this paper operationalizes tourism behavior through large-scale, sensor-based monitoring, and validates forecasting models against real tourist flows. In this sense, the present analysis represents an empirical instantiation of the impact of Nieto-García et al. (2023), demonstrating how their conceptual contribution translated into research design choices, collaboration with destination authorities, and policy-relevant evidence grounded in actual tourist behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Massimiliano Ferrara & Wassili Lasarov & Giampaolo Viglia, 2026. "Validating tourism modeling with real data," Post-Print hal-05521426, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05521426
    DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2026.104130
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05521426v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05521426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.