IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05514512.html

Poverty Eradication by Improving Waste Collection: An African Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Noukignon Koné

  • Anne Briand

    (LERN - Laboratoire d'Economie Rouen Normandie - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - IRIHS - Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université)

Abstract

Abidjan faces major challenges in waste management, with nearly 30% of urban households disposing of waste in open dumps. This practice poses serious health and environmental risks, especially in low-income neighborhoods. Improving waste services in these areas is critical for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and strengthening urban resilience. This study is based on a contingent valuation survey conducted in 2014 with 402 households living in low-income neighborhoods of Abidjan. To correct for self-selection bias in the use of informal waste collection services, the study employs the propensity score matching (PSM) method. This approach helps identify the key factors influencing household demand for informal waste services. Variables examined include material wealth, gender of the household head, perception of health risks, and access to improved infrastructure such as latrines and wastewater systems. The study also assesses the socio-economic and human impacts associated with the use of these informal services. The findings reveal that households using informal waste collection services experience improved socioeconomic outcomes. Specifically, these households allocate more of their budget to essential needs such as education, healthcare, and food. They also report better access to basic infrastructure, including potable water and legal electricity connections. A strong willingness to pay for improved waste services is observed, indicating that residents are aware of the environmental and health consequences of poor waste management and are motivated to enhance their living conditions. The determinants of service use such as wealth status, gender, and infrastructure access highlight the importance of addressing inequalities when designing waste management policies. This study underscores the need for inclusive policies that support public-private partnerships and introduce incentive-based pricing mechanisms to ensure sustainable financing of waste services. Policymakers should consider household constraints and expectations to foster responsible waste behavior and improve service uptake. Such approaches can contribute to achieving the SDGs, reducing environmental risks, and enhancing the well-being of vulnerable urban populations through more equitable and resilient waste management systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Noukignon Koné & Anne Briand, 2025. " Poverty Eradication by Improving Waste Collection: An African Case Study ," Post-Print hal-05514512, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05514512
    DOI: 10.1353/jda.2025.a965525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05514512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.