IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05506367.html

Characterization of regional substrates for the production of plants in containers

Author

Listed:
  • Katia Jazmín Romero-Bautista

    (ColPos - Colegio de Postgraduados)

  • David Jesús Palma López

    (ColPos - Colegio de Postgraduados)

  • César Jesús Vázquez Navarrete

    (ColPos - Colegio de Postgraduados)

  • José Jesús Obrador Olán

    (ColPos - Colegio de Postgraduados)

  • Winston Vlaminck

    (PalmElit)

  • Arnulfo Aldrete

    (ColPos - Colegio de Postgraduados)

  • Laurene Feintrenie

    (UMR TETIS - Territoires, Environnement, Télédétection et Information Spatiale - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - AgroParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the physical and chemical properties of waste from the oil palm industry (empty fruit bunches and palm kernel shell charcoal), from the forestry industry (Cedrela odorata sawdust and Eucalyptus spp. bark), and from the agroindustry (sugarcane bagasse, cocoa pod husk, and coconut fiber), in order to determine their potential as components of regional substrates. Design/Methodology/Approach: A completely randomized design was used for the experiment. Seven regional substrate treatments with three replicates were used to evaluate the response variables. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's multiple comparison test (p≤0.05) were used to analyze the results in the InfoStat v. 2020 statistical software. Results: Regional substrates had similar characteristics —and even a higher concentration of nutrients— than the commercial substrate, which was mainly based on sphagnum peat moss. Substrate S5 —eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.) bark:cocoa pod husk:cedar (Cedrela odorata) sawdust (3:1:1)— had more variables that were statistically similar to the commercial substrate, while S4 —cocoa pod husk:cedar sawdust:palm kernel shell charcoal (3:1.5:0.5)— stood out for its higher concentration of micronutrients. The results identified sustainable and accessible options that meet the recommended criteria for plant production in containers. Study Limitations/Implications: This study only took into account the characterization of regional waste and substrates; consequently, its effects on future plant production should be evaluated. Findings/Conclusions: The substrates were sustainable and affordable and met the recommended criteria for the plant production in containers.

Suggested Citation

  • Katia Jazmín Romero-Bautista & David Jesús Palma López & César Jesús Vázquez Navarrete & José Jesús Obrador Olán & Winston Vlaminck & Arnulfo Aldrete & Laurene Feintrenie, 2025. "Characterization of regional substrates for the production of plants in containers," Post-Print hal-05506367, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05506367
    DOI: 10.32854/tsdd2q79
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05506367v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05506367v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32854/tsdd2q79?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05506367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.