IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05495613.html

The distinction between the artisan and the artist from a marketing perspective: a semiotic square approach
[La distinción entre el artesano y el artista desde una perspectiva de marketing: análisis a través del método del cuadrado semiótico]

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Dezecot

    (ARGUMans - Laboratoire de recherche en gestion Le Mans Université - UM - Le Mans Université)

Abstract

The genesis of this research is based on two observations: the issue of the boundary between the concepts of artisan and artist has been debated for many years and remains very unclear; marketing is playing an increasingly important role among artisans, both at the academic level and in practice. Thus, the objective of this research is twofold: to contribute to enriching the debate on the boundary between the artisan and the artist from a marketing perspective, and to deepen the understanding of the artisan in terms of their practices, motivations, and strategic orientations. After analyzing the historical, institutional, and academic definitions of these two notions, the semiotic square method, developed by Greimas and Courtès (1993), is employed. The results highlight four types of activities (artisanal, artistic, commercial, and industrial) that oppose and differentiate themselves on several criteria: manual vs non-manual know-how, intrinsic vs extrinsic motivations, and product vs customer orientation. To sum up, the marketing orientation of the artisan appears as a crucial element in distinguishing them from the artist.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Dezecot, 2024. "The distinction between the artisan and the artist from a marketing perspective: a semiotic square approach [La distinción entre el artesano y el artista desde una perspectiva de marketing: análisis a través del método del cuadrado semiótico]," Post-Print hal-05495613, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05495613
    DOI: 10.7202/1113018ar
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05495613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.