IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05494487.html

The relationship between brand legitimacy, brand reputation, and brand status

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Nguyen
  • Yann Truong

    (ESSCA Research Lab - ESSCA - ESSCA – École supérieure des sciences commerciales d'Angers = ESSCA Business School)

  • Pauline Tesio

    (GRM - Groupe de Recherche en Management - EA 4711 - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur)

Abstract

The majority of marketing research on legitimacy focuses on macro-level phenomena, such as market creation or the legitimation of novel consumption practices (e.g., yoga, casino gambling). These studies predominantly rely on collective perceptions and often use proxies to measure legitimacy. In contrast, research examining legitimacy at the brand level remains limited. Existing work in this domain is heavily influenced by organizational literature and institutional theory, emphasizing the judgments of professional stakeholders such as business partners, investors, and public authorities. Consequently, the consumer perspective has been largely overlooked, representing an important gap in the literature. Addressing this gap, we leverage the development of a novel, valid, and reliable scale of brand legitimacy based on individual consumer assessments and demonstrate (N = 485), that brand legitimacy is distinct from other collective-level constructs, such as brand reputation and brand status. Moreover, we explain how these three constructs relate to one another.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Nguyen & Yann Truong & Pauline Tesio, 2025. "The relationship between brand legitimacy, brand reputation, and brand status," Post-Print hal-05494487, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05494487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05494487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.