IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05482466.html

Do Europeans really feel better at home than in a nursing home?

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Laferrère

    (LEDa - Laboratoire d'Economie de Dauphine - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Jérôme Schoenmaeckers

Abstract

The desire to age "in place" avoiding nursing homes (NHs) seems universally acknowledged, and the recent COVID-19 pandemic may have encouraged it. Using data from the Survey of Health Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), we show that those living in NH declared a lower level of life satisfaction than those living in the community. Controlling for demographics, the difference was around −8% over an average score of 6.73/10. Adding controls for the economic situation, health, and disability level the negative association becomes nonsignificant. Functional status seems to explain most of the difference in well-being between nursing and private homes. However, the selection into NH may be linked to unobservable characteristics. We tackle this causality issue in two ways. First by using propensity score matching methods. Living in an NH becomes associated with lower well-being. Finally, we make use of our longitudinal data to further reduce the potential impact of nonobservables. The conclusions are globally reversed: living in an NH is associated with higher well-being. This is coherent with a model of optimal residential choices: living in an NH might not be desired but proves to be the best choice for those who make it. This article is part of a Special Collection on Cross-National Gerontology.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Laferrère & Jérôme Schoenmaeckers, 2026. "Do Europeans really feel better at home than in a nursing home?," Post-Print hal-05482466, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05482466
    DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwaf041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05482466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.