IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05477598.html

Not all cryptocurrency holders are impulsive: the case of stablecoins

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamad El Haj

    (Nantes Univ - Nantes Université, LPPL - Laboratoire de Psychologie des Pays de la Loire - UA - Université d'Angers - Nantes Univ - UFR LL - Nantes Université - UFR Lettres et Langages - Nantes Université - pôle Humanités - Nantes Univ - Nantes Université)

  • Ahmed Moustafa

    (Bond University [Gold Coast])

Abstract

There is a surge of interest in the psychological profile of cryptocurrency users. We pursued this line of research by assessing impulsivity in holders of stablecoins vs. holders of other cryptocurrencies. In an online survey, we invited 115 participants to indicate the percentage of their stablecoins holding and to fill the Barratt Impulsivity Scale. Analysis demonstrated significant negative correlations between stablecoins holding and non-planning, cognitive, and motor impulsivity, that is, the higher the percentage of stablecoins holding was, the lower impulsivity was. A higher percentage of stablecoin holding was associated with a decreased tendency to act without considering future consequences of decisions. Greater stablecoin holding was correlated with indicators of higher cognitive and motor control in decision making (e.g., increased inhibition of impulsive risky decisions, increased inhibition of prepotent emotional responses such as the tendency to act "on the spur of the moment"). While some cryptocurrencies trading strategies can be associated with some levels of impulsivity, stablecoins holding seems to be associated with low levels of impulsivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamad El Haj & Ahmed Moustafa, 2025. "Not all cryptocurrency holders are impulsive: the case of stablecoins," Post-Print hal-05477598, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05477598
    DOI: 10.1007/s42521-025-00165-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05477598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.