IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05471863.html

Les pratiques de commoning pour nourrir la régénérescence des SCIC ? Le cas d’une coopérative culturelle

Author

Listed:
  • Mathilde Gouteux

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Multistakeholder cooperatives (SCICs in French law) hold out the hope of a participatory and democratic revival to meet local needs. As alternatives, however, they are subject to a process of degeneration that jeopardizes their political project and democratic functioning. Within the literature studying the practices and processes that organizations put in place to combat this degeneration, SCICs occupy a marginal place. Yet their multi-stakeholder nature, social utility and local roots make them a resilient form with strong potential for regeneration. Our paper is in line with this approach, and proposes to explore the regenerative practices of SCICs by comparing this literature with that on commoning, seen as a process of collective organization around a common resource, regulated by co-constructed rules in perpetual adaptation. By carrying out an ethnographic case study of a cultural SCIC in a phase of organizational regeneration, we propose to see commoning practices as strengthening SCICs' capacity for regeneration. We then identify the modalities of commoning, such as the creation of conditions for inclusive participation, the elaboration of evolving frameworks, democratic revisibility, and we define cooperation as continuous learning requiring a perpetual reinvention of its frameworks and rules.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathilde Gouteux, 2025. "Les pratiques de commoning pour nourrir la régénérescence des SCIC ? Le cas d’une coopérative culturelle," Post-Print hal-05471863, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05471863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05471863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.