IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05462283.html

Challenges and pathways for matching corporate value‐chain biodiversity losses and gains
[Défis et pistes pour compenser les pertes et les gains en matière de biodiversité dans la chaîne de valeur des entreprises]

Author

Listed:
  • Margaux Durand

    (UMR PSAE - Paris-Saclay Applied Economics - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, CDC Biodiversité)

  • Thomas White

    (Leverhulme Centre for Nature Recovery and Department of Biology, University of Oxford, The Biodiversity Consultancy, Cambridge, CB2 1SJ, U.K.)

  • Talitha Bromwich

    (Leverhulme Centre for Nature Recovery and Department of Biology, University of Oxford, SoGE - School of Geography and the Environment [Oxford] - University of Oxford, Wild Business Ltd., Oxford)

  • Sophus zu Ermgassen

    (Leverhulme Centre for Nature Recovery and Department of Biology, University of Oxford)

  • Vincent Martinet

    (UMR PSAE - Paris-Saclay Applied Economics - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, CEPS - Centre d'Economie de l'ENS Paris-Saclay - Université Paris-Saclay - ENS Paris Saclay - Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay)

Abstract

In the context of ambitious global biodiversity goals, the need to compensate for the impact of corporate activities is no longer restricted to direct impacts but extends to the entire value chain of corporations. This is challenging, considering the substantial uncertainties involved in measuring corporate value‐chain biodiversity losses and gains, which render their comparison difficult. Corporations run the risk of taking inadequate action and making compensatory statements that are not supported by equivalent losses and gains, potentially exacerbating loss of biodiversity, instead of supporting its recovery, and exposing companies to operational, regulatory, market, reputational, and financial risks. We considered the sources of uncertainty that hinder the accuracy of corporate biodiversity impact measurements (limited data, complex value chains, assumptions in calculation methods and models, imperfect matching of metrics and reality, lack of counterfactuals). We also considered approaches that can be used to match loss and gain metrics: measureing both with a unique metric, conversing between metrics, and monetary valuation. We then devised a framework that represents the risk of making inappropriate statements depending on the level of uncertainty of measured value‐chain biodiversity impacts to help corporations in making more credible claims.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaux Durand & Thomas White & Talitha Bromwich & Sophus zu Ermgassen & Vincent Martinet, 2026. "Challenges and pathways for matching corporate value‐chain biodiversity losses and gains [Défis et pistes pour compenser les pertes et les gains en matière de biodiversité dans la chaîne de valeur ," Post-Print hal-05462283, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05462283
    DOI: 10.1111/cobi.70221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05462283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.