IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05456936.html

Tradition monétaire, approche réelle: la séparation est-elle insurmontable?

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Piluso

    (CERTOP - Centre d'Etude et de Recherche Travail Organisation Pouvoir - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse, IUT Toulouse Auch Castres - Institut Universitaire de Technologie - Paul Sabatier - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse)

  • Raphaël Porcherot

    (IDHES - Institutions et Dynamiques Historiques de l'Économie et de la Société - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - UP8 - Université Paris 8 - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - ENS Paris Saclay - Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay, ACT - Analyse des Crises et Transitions - LABEX ICCA - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UPCité - Université Paris Cité - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université)

Abstract

This article aims to clarify the differences and similarities between the real and monetary approaches to economic theory, which Schumpeter and Cartelier identify as the two main branches. First, we demonstrate that the unsuccessful attempts to synthesise the work of Sraffa and Keynes, or Marx and Keynes, are undoubtedly linked to the irreconcilable nature of these authors' initial postulates and hypotheses. Sraffa and Marx, on the one hand, and Keynes, on the other, belong to opposing traditions. However, an analysis of certain works belonging to the real approach reveals affinities with the monetary approach. The asymmetry hypothesis between entrepreneurs and employees, analysis of imbalances and the status of money as a necessary intermediary in exchanges are not exclusive to the monetary tradition.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Piluso & Raphaël Porcherot, 2026. "Tradition monétaire, approche réelle: la séparation est-elle insurmontable?," Post-Print hal-05456936, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05456936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05456936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.