IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05455882.html

De Booba à Indexia : ce que les scandales révèlent des angles morts de la recherche en management

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Philippe Denis

    (Université Paris-Saclay, RITM - Réseaux Innovation Territoires et Mondialisation - Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Hugo Gaillard

    (ARGUMans - Laboratoire de recherche en gestion Le Mans Université - UM - Le Mans Université)

  • Joan Le Goff

    (IRG - Institut de Recherche en Gestion - UPEC UP12 - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 - Université Gustave Eiffel)

Abstract

À partir des scandales Booba et Indexia, ce texte explore les angles morts de la recherche en management. Il met en évidence les limites épistémologiques, méthodologiques, conceptuelles et éthiques qui empêchent la discipline de penser les phénomènes émergents, ambivalents ou déviants, en dépit de leur impact sociétal parfois considérable. En dialogue avec les travaux critiques récents, il propose des pistes pour renouveler les objets, les méthodes, les engagements et la formation en management, afin de proposer une autre conception de la responsabilité académique.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Philippe Denis & Hugo Gaillard & Joan Le Goff, 2026. "De Booba à Indexia : ce que les scandales révèlent des angles morts de la recherche en management," Post-Print hal-05455882, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05455882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05455882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.