IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05451882.html

Farmers empowerment? Connecting agricultural entrepreneurship to citizen participation in a post-revolution rural context

Author

Listed:
  • Kaouther Toumi

    (LGTO - Laboratoire de Gestion et des Transitions Organisationnelles - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse, IUT Toulouse Auch Castres - Institut Universitaire de Technologie - Paul Sabatier - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse, Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse)

  • Mikael Akimowicz

    (Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LEST, Aix-en-Provence, France)

  • Rania Chaabane

    (LGCO - Laboratoire Gouvernance et Contrôle Organisationnel - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse, LUMEN - Lille University Management Lab - ULR 4999 - Université de Lille)

  • Nabil Ghalleb

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the extent to which agricultural entrepreneurship resources – embedded within citizen empowerment (CE) initiatives – contribute to fostering civic participation among farmers in a post-revolution rural context. Design/methodology/approach Using a qualitative abductive approach, the authors evaluate the impact of the youth empowerment and sustainability (YES) programme, a CE initiative funded by the United Nations Democracy Fund and implemented in rural Tunisia between 2017 and 2022. Data were collected through a combination of focus group discussions and individual interviews, yielding 26 testimonies from beneficiaries of the programme. Findings The findings indicate that while the programme resources enhanced farmers' awareness of participatory democracy (PD), levels of actual civic engagement at local level remain limited. This is attributed to both the suboptimal configuration of entrepreneurial support mechanisms within the programme and the persistence of structural and contextual barriers impeding agricultural entrepreneurship and civic participation in post-revolution rural areas. Research limitations/implications The study is based on a retrospective evaluation conducted at the end of the programme and relies primarily on participants' self-reported experiences and perceptions. Methodological constraints that include limited field access and logistical challenges resulted in small focus group sizes, averaging two to three participants per session. Moreover, the relatively small sample size means that generalisability of the results to the wider farming population was limited. Practical implications The study offers useful insights for development practitioners and policymakers aiming to enhance PD through entrepreneurship-driven initiatives. It identifies the main enablers and barriers affecting civic engagement in rural areas, providing guidance for the design of more effective strategies to empower farming communities and support sustainable agricultural entrepreneurship in post-revolution or transitional settings. Originality/value To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first empirical study to explore the intersection of agricultural entrepreneurship and civic participation within a CE framework targeting rural farmers. The inclusion of both entrepreneurship and citizenship dimensions offers a new lens to evaluate democratic consolidation processes in transitional rural contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaouther Toumi & Mikael Akimowicz & Rania Chaabane & Nabil Ghalleb, 2025. "Farmers empowerment? Connecting agricultural entrepreneurship to citizen participation in a post-revolution rural context," Post-Print hal-05451882, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05451882
    DOI: 10.1108/JEEE-10-2024-0482
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05451882v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05451882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.