IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05446928.html

Unearthing facets of sustainability initiatives reporting and legitimacy: a knowledge management perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Weiming Liu

    (Guangzhou Maritime University)

  • Nidhi Sahore

    (IMS - Institute of Management Studies Ghaziabad)

  • Bhumika Gupta

    (LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], IMT-BS - MMS - Département Management, Marketing et Stratégie - TEM - Télécom Ecole de Management - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • Paolo Coppola

    (UNISA - Università degli Studi di Salerno = University of Salerno)

  • Antonella Della Puca

    (UNISA - Università degli Studi di Salerno = University of Salerno)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to investigate the sustainability disclosure framework surrounding India's tourism firms and to analyze the Environmental Initiatives (EI), Social Initiatives (SI) and Governance Initiatives (GI) of these firms, which constitute their intellectual capital (IC) and establish their legitimacy. Design/methodology/approach - This inductive approach–based study investigates the sustainability reports of listed tourism firms. It analyzes the extent and variance of sustainability disclosures concerning environmental (E), social (S) and governance (G) aspects through a combination of qualitative content analysis and quantitative methods. Findings - Based on a sample of 30 listed tourism companies that are publishing business responsibility and sustainability reports (BRSR), the results of these reports, based on content and quantitative analysis, indicate the extent and variance of environmental, societal and governance (ESG) initiatives reported by the tourism firms that help legitimize their activities and contribute to intellectual capital formation. Research limitations/implications - This study sought to analyze the sustainability reports as per the BRSR 2021 framework, which is so far applicable to the top 1,000 listed companies of India; however, not many tourism firms fall into this category. As a result, the number of firms that published sustainability reports in 2021–2022 is small. Future studies can extend this research in tourism with a more extensive data set for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Moreover, there is no limitation to applying this methodology in other industry sectors with a larger sample size. Practical implications - ESG disclosures by these firms contribute to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through their business operations and initiatives' ESG impact. Policymakers and managers, both at national and global levels, can push ahead the agenda of sustainable tourism through the interaction of firms and stakeholders within the national policy preview, such as BRSR reporting, and international policy purview, such as SDG mapping of ESG initiatives as a part of larger sustainability goals where tourism firms are one of the key contributors to them. Social implications - The quality and extent of ESG initiatives and their variance in tourism firms affect how diverse stakeholders gauge and assess the business and social responsibility discharged by the listed entities in this sector. Originality/value - Most disclosure-based studies focus on aggregate disclosures; however, this study aims to examine the extent and variance of sustainability disclosures related to environment (E), social (S) and governance (G) in a disaggregated manner within the tourism sector. Such ESG initiative-based disclosures are then mapped to SDGs to find that ESG initiatives are in tandem with the SDG goals. This study found that the listed tourism firms in India are passably reporting on sustainability to establish legitimacy, and the extent of associated initiative disclosures varies significantly within the groups contributing primarily toward green intellectual capital formation due to overarching EI. In addition, the knowledge management–enabled ESG disclosures collectively contribute toward enhancing human, structural and relational capital to legitimize their initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiming Liu & Nidhi Sahore & Bhumika Gupta & Paolo Coppola & Antonella Della Puca, 2026. "Unearthing facets of sustainability initiatives reporting and legitimacy: a knowledge management perspective," Post-Print hal-05446928, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05446928
    DOI: 10.1108/JKM-06-2025-0896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05446928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.