Author
Listed:
- Mohammed Zakriya
(LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - ULCO - Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
- Nour Chams
(UAB - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona = Autonomous University of Barcelona = Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona)
Abstract
Research Question/Issue This study investigates whether and how corporate governance influences environmental and social performance in Chinese firms. Two mechanisms of corporate governance are examined: external (shareholder‐focused) and internal (CSR strategy‐ and management‐focused). Research Findings/Insights The findings reveal a significant positive effect of corporate governance on environmental and social performance in China, mainly driven by firms' CSR strategy‐focused governance practices. State ownership of enterprises significantly moderates how governance affects both environmental and social performance, with positive and negative moderation observed for external and internal governance mechanisms, respectively. Furthermore, an environmental regulation shock accentuates the positive influence of corporate governance on environmental performance but not on social performance. Theoretical/Academic Implications The main theoretical insight reflects a shift in the governance discourse from "conflict of interest" to "differentiation of interest" between shareholders and managers regarding sustainability concerns. The results shed light on the considerable differences between shareholder and manager behaviors toward environmental and/or social practices. Practitioner/Policy Implications This study informs firms and regulators on corporate governance's nonfinancial implications in China. Reforming governance characteristics can be a key factor for firms aiming to improve their environmental and social performance, specifically by re‐envisioning their internal governance mechanisms that are CSR strategy‐oriented. From the government perspective, we provide insights into how, through ownership and regulatory interventions, governance mechanisms tend to balance environmental and social performance in China.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05379856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.