Author
Listed:
- Bernard S Hounkpèvi
(National Timber Office of Benin (ONAB), BP 1238 Cotonou, Benin.)
- Barthelemy G Honfoga
(Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, 06 BP 1892 Cotonou, Akpakpa PK3, Benin.)
Abstract
Knowledge and practice of project risk management are crucial today for the success of agricultural projects which usually require huge investment and operational costs. They are key to securing profits for investors and social benefits for communities. Risk management is embedded in the project cycle. It is a cross-cutting issue, from project design to implementation, mid-term evaluation and conclusion and it can be investigated by referring to some generic theoretical variables, as described in the workflow diagram of project risk management. This article examined the extent to which the practice of risk management in a community resource-based forestry project in Benin complies with the best practice. An empirical model, based on indicators of those variables, was therefore designed to analyze the case. The project is being implemented by the National Timber Office (ONAB) of Benin and the research was done at its mid-term evaluation. Twenty (20) high-level project's technical staffs were interviewed to elicit data on operational indicators of above variables and to rate the current practice against the best practice. A composite project risk management index, combining the declared risks, their frequencies and the extent of mitigation strategies, was calculated for the purpose. The index observed value is 0.349 or 34.9%, compared to the theoretical maximum of 100%. Therefore, the risk management practice so far in the project is weak. The main reasons include lack of information on project's benefits for communities, lack of technical and social feasibility study, heavy administrative procedures during implementation and lack of training for project staff on project risk management. The study calls for greater strategic planning and better training to enhance risk management in community-based forestry projects.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05366565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.