Author
Abstract
This article examines Decision No. 2024-DEC-02 of the New Caledonian Competition Authority (ACNC) regarding the proposed relocation and expansion of a Naturalia store in Dumbéa. The case highlights one of the distinctive features of New Caledonian competition law, which requires prior control on retail development projects, even when they have a very limited scope. In this instance, despite a modest extension of only 102 m², the ACNC reviewed the notification under an exceptional procedure triggered by a market share threshold (25% within the relevant catchment area). By equating the relevant market with the catchment area, the Authority likely overestimated the notifying party's market power and underestimated the substitution options available to consumers. This reasoning led the ACNC to conclude that the planned extension could strengthen a local dominant position. Even if that were true – which is not – it would still need to de demonstrated that this extension is not based on merit. In practice, however, the project was very unlikely to generate significant anticompetitive effects. The risks mentioned – local dominant position or excessive pressure on suppliers – appear overstated, especially since the Authority already has ex post tools to sanction potential abuses. Conversely, blocking the expansion deprives consumers of a broader product offering and risks stifling a dynamic operator in the organic sector. This decision illustrates the potentially counterproductive consequences of ex ante control over retail developments in New Caledonia, and by extension, in French Polynesia. Far from fostering competition, such preventive mechanisms may freeze market structures, discourage investment, and send a negative signal to economic stakeholders. A more effective approach would be to refocus the Authority's action on sanctioning actual abuses of dominant position, rather than on hindering normal internal growth dynamics.
Suggested Citation
Florent Venayre & Christian Montet, 2025.
"The ‘organic’ — good for your health… but not for competition? [Le « bio » bon pour la santé… mais pas pour la concurrence ?],"
Post-Print
hal-05335900, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05335900
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05335900v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05335900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.