Author
Listed:
- Houyam Boudaouine
(MRM-MPR - Management et Pratiques Responsables - MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - UM - Université de Montpellier, MRM-RH - Montpellier Research in Management - Ressources Humaines - MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - UM - Université de Montpellier, UM - Université de Montpellier)
- Florence Loose
(UM - Université de Montpellier, MRM-MPR - Management et Pratiques Responsables - MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - UM - Université de Montpellier, MRM-RH - Montpellier Research in Management - Ressources Humaines - MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - UM - Université de Montpellier)
- Anne Loubès
(UM - Université de Montpellier, MRM-MPR - Management et Pratiques Responsables - MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - UM - Université de Montpellier, MRM-RH - Montpellier Research in Management - Ressources Humaines - MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - UM - Université de Montpellier)
Abstract
The ethical and sustainable transformation of organizations requires the implementation of an engaged and civic-minded Human Resources Management (HRM), in line with the realities of daily work experienced by workers, often marked by organizational paradoxes. In work, certain situations seem logical in isolation but simultaneously become irrational. The resulting paradoxical tensions can create cognitive discomfort and potential psychological suffering among workers, potentially affecting their perception of meaning at work. Although these contradictions can exist at all levels of organizations, front-line workers are particularly exposed to them because they must make trade-offs – often in a hurry and sometimes without adequate resources – between what the procedural framework of prescribed work imposes on them and what real work entails, especially when it comes to satisfying the divergent interests of various stakeholders. This is the case of waste disposal center workers, whose front-line operational work provides a suitable framework for exploring organizational paradoxes, especially since the link between paradoxes and the perception of meaning at work remains little explored in the literature. This communication proposes to identify the main paradoxes that waste disposal center workers face and the implications of these paradoxes on their perception of meaning at work. To examine these links, an exploratory case study was conducted based on semi-structured interviews. By combining a typology of paradoxes and the characteristics of meaningful work, it suggests an enrichment of existing models to better reflect the reality of front-line workers and adapt managerial practices in favor of meaning at work.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05331945. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.