IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05296104.html

Mapping Theoretical Perspectives for Requisite Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Marion Neukam

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Emmanuel Muller

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Thierry Burger-Helmchen

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

Abstract

In increasingly turbulent environments, organizations must go beyond generic robustness and develop Requisite Resilience, the capacity to align internal variety with environmental variety to sustain core functions during crises. This study situates Requisite Resilience within organizational theory and strategic management, assessing how major theories of the firm contribute to its development. The analysis groups these perspectives into foundational/diagnostic theories, which clarify environmental, structural and institutional constraints and correspond to passive resilience frameworks, and enabling/capability-building theories, which emphasize managerial agency, resource orchestration and adaptive learning, corresponding to active resilience frameworks. Findings indicate that while foundational perspectives offer essential diagnostics, they are insufficient on their own to foster Requisite Resilience. A composite configuration provides the strongest fit: co-evolutionary views offer an integrative backbone, dynamic capabilities and organizational learning enhance sensing, seizing and acting, and resource dependence theory informs the design of permeable boundaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Marion Neukam & Emmanuel Muller & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2025. "Mapping Theoretical Perspectives for Requisite Resilience," Post-Print hal-05296104, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05296104
    DOI: 10.3390/info16100854
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05296104v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05296104v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3390/info16100854?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Caroline Hussler & Patrick Cohendet, 2016. "Les grands auteurs en management de l'innovation et de la créativité," Post-Print hal-02189748, HAL.
    2. Andrew M. Carton, 2025. "The Six Dimensions of Strong Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 1242-1270, July.
    3. Dean A. Shepherd & Jeffery S. Mcmullen & William Ocasio, 2017. "Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers' opportunity beliefs for strategic action," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 626-644, March.
    4. Behfar, Stefan Kambiz & Turkina, Ekaterina & Burger-Helmchen, Thierry, 2018. "Knowledge management in OSS communities: Relationship between dense and sparse network structures," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 167-174.
    5. Izuchukwu Mbaraonye & Varkey Titus Jr. & Jeffrey Cavanaugh, 2025. "A Real Options Perspective on Entrepreneurial Orientation and Government Ties," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 49(3), pages 817-845, May.
    6. Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), 2012. "Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13623, March.
    7. Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft, 2012. "Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm," Post-Print halshs-01378625, HAL.
    8. Paul Milgrom & John Roberts, 1988. "Economic Theories of the Firm: Past, Present, and Future," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 21(3), pages 444-458, August.
    9. Philip Anderson, 1999. "Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 216-232, June.
    10. Xiaomei He & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2025. "Evolving Knowledge Management: Artificial Intelligence and the Dynamics of Social Interactions," Post-Print hal-04990216, HAL.
    11. Fotios Gkatzoglou & Emmanouil Sofianos & Amélie Barbier-Gauchard, 2025. "The EU Public Debt Synchronization: A Complex Networks Approach," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Richard P. Nelson & Giovanni Dosi & Constance Helfat & Andreas Pyka & Pier-Paolo Saviotti & Keun Lee & Kurt Dopfer & Franco Malerba & Sidney Winter, 2018. "Modern evolutionary economics: an overview," Post-Print hal-02097506, HAL.
    13. William Ocasio, 1997. "Towards An Attention‐Based View Of The Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(S1), pages 187-206, July.
    14. Rodolphe Durand & Robert M. Grant & Tammy L. Madsen & Lenos Trigeorgis & Jeffrey J. Reuer, 2017. "Real options theory in strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 42-63, January.
    15. Popli, Manish & Ahsan, Faisal M. & Mukherjee, Debmalya, 2022. "Upper echelons and firm internationalization: A critical review and future directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 505-521.
    16. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    17. Patrick Cohendet & Patrick Llerena, 2003. "Routines and incentives: the role of communities in the firm," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 12(2), pages 271-297, April.
    18. Sébastien Brion & Romain Gandia, 2016. "How to Avoid Dependence in the Videogame Industry: The Case of Ankama," Post-Print hal-01414510, HAL.
    19. Daniel A. Levinthal & Alessandro Marino, 2015. "Three Facets of Organizational Adaptation: Selection, Variety, and Plasticity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 743-755, June.
    20. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    21. Kathleen R. Conner & C. K. Prahalad, 1996. "A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(5), pages 477-501, October.
    22. Patrick Cohendet & Olivier Dupouët & Patrick Llerena & Raouf Naggar & Romain Rampa, 2025. "Knowledge-based approaches to the firm: an idea-driven perspective," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 34(3), pages 479-501.
    23. Stephanie Duchek, 2020. "Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 215-246, April.
    24. Karl E. Weick, 1988. "Enacted Sensemaking In Crisis Situations[1]," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 305-317, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jason M. Pattit & Katherina G. Pattit & J.-C. Spender, 2024. "Edith T. Penrose: Economist of 'The Ordinary Business of Life'," Strategic Management Review, now publishers, vol. 5(1-2), pages 51-74, April.
    2. Alessandra Colombelli & Francesco Quatraro, 2012. "The European Firm," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 17, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Jim Andersén, 2023. "Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5506-5520, December.
    4. Stienstra, Miranda, 2020. "The determinants and performance implications of alliance partner acquisition," Other publications TiSEM 7fdee0c2-d4d2-4f5b-95e3-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Minerva Martínez Avila & Juan José García-Machado & Eréndira Fierro Moreno, 2021. "A Multiple Full Mediating Effect in a PLS Hierarchical Component Model: Application to the Collaborative Public Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Goran Vlasic & Zoran Krupka & Kristijan Keleminic, 2025. "The Role of CEO Experience and Focus on Firm Performance," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 37(SI), pages 25-46.
    7. Jeremy Galbreath & Chia‐Yang Chang & Daniel Tisch, 2023. "The impact of a proactive environmental strategy on environmentally sustainable practices in service firms: The moderating effect of information use value," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5420-5434, December.
    8. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu & John A. Parnell & Melissa Yan Yee Yick, 2021. "Identifying influential studies and maturity level in intellectual structure of fields: evidence from strategic management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1271-1309, February.
    9. Cricelli, Livio & Mauriello, Roberto & Strazzullo, Serena, 2023. "Preventing open innovation failures: A managerial framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    10. Brice Foulon & Sylvain Marsat, 2023. "Does environmental footprint influence the resilience of firms facing environmental penalties?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 6154-6168, December.
    11. Coulet, Jean-Claude, 2019. "The organization activity: A foresight approach of theoretical knowledge evolution in management science," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 160-168.
    12. Alberto Bertello & Paola Bernardi & Francesca Ricciardi, 2024. "Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 633-683, February.
    13. Gao, Yuan & Gudergan, Siegfried P. & Lin, Nidthida, 2025. "Dynamic capability deployment: The roles of dominant logic and international entrepreneurial orientation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(2).
    14. Michael J. Leiblein & Jeffrey J. Reuer & Todd Zenger, 2018. "What Makes a Decision Strategic?," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 558-573, December.
    15. Philip Mundlos, 2025. "The impact of artificial intelligence on managerial attention allocation for discontinuous change: a conceptual framework," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 1-45, June.
    16. Nicolaï Foss & Nils Stieglitz, 2012. "Modern Resource-based Theory(ies)," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Shakeel Sarwar, Jawad Iqbal, 2020. "Framework Development of High Performance Work Systems (HPWSs) and Faculty Productivity: A Qualitative Approach," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, March.
    18. Jan Lampe & Priscilla Sarai Kraft & Andreas Bausch, 2020. "Mapping the Field of Research on Entrepreneurial Organizations (1937–2016): A Bibliometric Analysis and Research Agenda," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(4), pages 784-816, July.
    19. Oliveira, Fabio & Kakabadse, Nada & Khan, Nadeem, 2022. "Board engagement with digital technologies: A resource dependence framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 804-818.
    20. Arie Y. Lewin & Henk W. Volberda, 1999. "Prolegomena on Coevolution: A Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(5), pages 519-534, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05296104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.