IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05291446.html

Contested Waters: Analyzing Third-Party Challenges in French Water Contract Governance (2005-2023)

Author

Listed:
  • Justine Le Floch

    (LAB IAE Paris - Sorbonne - IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

  • Stéphane S. Saussier

    (LAB IAE Paris - Sorbonne - IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

Abstract

The management of local public services, often debated during elections, is a growing concern for public authorities. When outsourced, these services can prompt legal challenges from third parties – interest groups, citizens, local governments, and competitors – seeking strategic or personal gain. While prior studies address how the risk of third-party opportunism affects contract design, few examine its actual frequency or forms. This study fills that gap by analysing 1,690 first-instance administrative litigation cases (2005–2023) related to drinking water and sanitation services in France. Using logistic regressions, it identifies the actors most likely to act opportunistically. Findings show that, although competitors excluded from tenders initiate the most lawsuits, interest groups display the highest levels of opportunism, targeting decisions on tenders, governance, and tariffs. These results shed light on strategic litigation behaviour and underline the importance of considering third-party opportunism in the governance of public-private partnerships.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Justine Le Floch & Stéphane S. Saussier, 2025. "Contested Waters: Analyzing Third-Party Challenges in French Water Contract Governance (2005-2023)," Post-Print hal-05291446, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05291446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05291446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.