IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05271984.html

Facial cues of sickness reduce trustworthiness judgements, with stronger effects in women

Author

Listed:
  • Megan N Cesarini-Williams

    (Karolinska Institutet [Stockholm])

  • Julie Lasselin

    (Stockholm University, Karolinska Institutet [Stockholm])

  • Mats Lekander

    (Stockholm University, Karolinska Institutet [Stockholm])

  • John Axelsson

    (Stockholm University, Karolinska Institutet [Stockholm])

  • Mats J Olsson

    (Karolinska Institutet [Stockholm])

  • Arnaud Tognetti

    (CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier)

Abstract

A behavioral defense against disease involves detecting sickness cues in others and responding adaptively, such as by avoiding social interactions. While studies have shown that humans can discriminate sickness cues above chance in faces after sickness induction, whether this discrimination affects approach-avoidance behaviors remains uncertain. Here, we investigated how facial sickness cues influence judgments of trustworthiness, serving as a proxy measure for social avoidance. In a prior study, facial photographs were taken of 21 individuals when sick (two hours after an endotoxin injection causing a transient systemic inflammation) and healthy (following placebo injection). In the current study, participants in two separate experiments viewed these paired facial photographs and were asked, in a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm, to identify which face appeared sick (n = 94) or more trustworthy (n = 82). Participants discriminated sick faces significantly above chance (73.1 %), with females (76.0 %) performing significantly better than males (69.3 %). Additionally, sick faces were perceived as significantly less trustworthy, being selected in only 34.9 % of trials. Notably, the higher the sickness discrimination accuracy for a particular face, the less likely that face was to be judged as trustworthy. Moreover, females (30.5 %) were significantly less likely than males (39.5 %) to judge sick faces as the more trustworthy looking. Individual differences in participants' disease vulnerability, disgust sensitivity, and frequency of sickness, as well as facial stimulus participants' inflammatory response intensity measured via interleukin-6 blood concentrations, body temperature, and sickness symptoms, did not predict sickness discrimination accuracy or trustworthiness judgments. Together, these findings suggest that visual sickness cues negatively affect trustworthiness judgments, potentially reflecting social avoidant behaviors towards individuals who appear sick. While judgments of facial trustworthiness may be considered a social inference about whether an individual is safe to approach, future research should also include manifest measures of approach-avoidance in response to sickness cues.

Suggested Citation

  • Megan N Cesarini-Williams & Julie Lasselin & Mats Lekander & John Axelsson & Mats J Olsson & Arnaud Tognetti, 2025. "Facial cues of sickness reduce trustworthiness judgements, with stronger effects in women," Post-Print hal-05271984, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05271984
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2025.106102
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05271984v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05271984v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bbi.2025.106102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ert, Eyal & Fleischer, Aliza & Magen, Nathan, 2016. "Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 62-73.
    2. Donald C. Behringer & Mark J. Butler & Jeffrey D. Shields, 2006. "Avoidance of disease by social lobsters," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7092), pages 421-421, May.
    3. Arnaud Tognetti & Supreet Saluja & Nathalie Lybert & Julie Lasselin & Sandra Tamm & Catarina Lensmar & Bianka Karshikoff & Simon Cervenka & Mats Lekander & Mats J Olsson, 2023. "Olfactory Cues of Naturally Occurring Systemic Inflammation: A Pilot Study of Seasonal Allergy," Post-Print hal-04362298, HAL.
    4. Arnaud Tognetti & Evelina Thunell & Marta Zakrzewska & Jonas Olofsson & Mats Lekander & John Axelsson & Mats J Olsson, 2023. "Discriminating between sick and healthy faces based on early sickness cues: an exploratory analysis of sex differences," Post-Print hal-04235692, HAL.
    5. Constantin Rezlescu & Brad Duchaine & Christopher Y Olivola & Nick Chater, 2012. "Unfakeable Facial Configurations Affect Strategic Choices in Trust Games with or without Information about Past Behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-6, March.
    6. Arnaud Tognetti & Mats J Olsson, 2023. "Humans can detect axillary odor cues of an acute respiratory infection in others," Post-Print hal-04974240, HAL.
    7. Jaeger, Bastian & Oud, Bastiaan & Williams, Tony & Krumhuber, Eva G. & Fehr, Ernst & Engelmann, Jan B., 2022. "Can people detect the trustworthiness of strangers based on their facial appearance?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 43(4), pages 296-303.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abraham, Diya & Greiner, Ben & Stephanides, Marianne, 2023. "On the Internet you can be anyone: An experiment on strategic avatar choice in online marketplaces," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 251-261.
    2. Duan, Yang & Hsieh, Tien-Shih & Wang, Ray R. & Wang, Zhihong, 2020. "Entrepreneurs' facial trustworthiness, gender, and crowdfunding success," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Timm Teubner & David Dann & Florian Hawlitschek & Mareike Möhlmann, 2024. "First vs. Lasting Impressions: How Cognitive and Affective Trust Cues Coordinate Match-Making in Online Sharing Platforms," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 217-265, April.
    4. Abel François & Sophie Panel & Laurent Weill, 2023. "Dictators’ facial characteristics and foreign direct investment," Post-Print hal-03969697, HAL.
    5. Vi, Ly & Dang, Huy Xuan & Vu, Nam Thanh, 2024. "Impression management in the boardroom: How CEO facial trustworthiness influences turnover risk," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    6. Neus Vila-Brunet & Josep Llach, 2020. "OSS-Qual: Holistic Scale to Assess Customer Quality Perception When Buying Secondhand Products in Online Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Zuo, Wenming & Bai, Weijing & Zhu, Wenfeng & He, Xinming & Qiu, Xinxin, 2022. "Changes in service quality of sharing accommodation: Evidence from airbnb," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Chunfang Zhao & Yingliang Wu & Yunfeng Chen & Guohua Chen, 2023. "Multiscale Effects of Hedonic Attributes on Airbnb Listing Prices Based on MGWR: A Case Study of Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Zhang, Ning & Fan, Xing & He, LiFeng & Cheng, Xin & Zhang, Liang & Liu, Rong, 2024. "The impact of the Seller's facial image on consumer purchase behavior in peer-to-peer accommodation platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    10. Wan Kei Tham & Weng Marc Lim & Julian Vieceli, 2023. "Foundations of consumption and production in the sharing economy," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 2979-3002, December.
    11. Bresciani, Stefano & Ferraris, Alberto & Santoro, Gabriele & Premazzi, Katia & Quaglia, Roberto & Yahiaoui, Dorra & Viglia, Giampaolo, 2021. "The seven lives of Airbnb. The role of accommodation types," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. Sonny Rosenthal & Jean Yi Colette Tan & Ting Fang Poh, 2020. "Reputation Cues as Signals in the Sharing Economy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, April.
    13. Dwenger, Nadja & Lohse, Tim, 2019. "Do individuals successfully cover up their lies? Evidence from a compliance experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 74-87.
    14. Josep MARTÍNEZ-POLO & Jesús MARTÍNEZ-SÁNCHEZ, 2018. "Reputation And Trust In Sharing Economy Platforms: The Case Of Traity," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 18(2), pages 143-158.
    15. Jorge V Pérez-Rodríguez & Juan M Hernández & Julián Andrada-Félix, 2024. "Modelling prices and volatilities in the sharing economy," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(5), pages 1189-1215, August.
    16. Yuanyuan Guo & Yanqing Wang & Chaoyou Wang, 2019. "Exploring the Salient Attributes of Short-Term Rental Experience: An Analysis of Online Reviews from Chinese Guests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-19, August.
    17. Rahman Ummeh Habiba Faria Benteh & Zafar Muhammad Khubaib, 2020. "Factors Influencing Uber Adoption In Bangladesh And Pakistan," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 86-97, January.
    18. Ethem Ilbiz & Christian Kaunert, 2022. "Sharing Economy for Tackling Crypto-Laundering: The Europol Associated ‘Global Conference on Criminal Finances and Cryptocurrencies’," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    19. Josef Zelenka & Tracy Azubuike & Martina Pásková, 2021. "Trust Model for Online Reviews of Tourism Services and Evaluation of Destinations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Venkateswaran, Viswanathan & S Kumar, Deepak & Gupta, Deepak, 2021. "‘To Trust or Not’: Impact of camouflage strategies on trust in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 110-126.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05271984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.