IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05271670.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Audit Quality at BPK North Sumatra: Analysis of the Influence of Auditor Factors and Moderating Public Information Disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Rumi Friska Sitanggang

    (Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.)

  • Lia May Sarah Ginting

    (Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.)

  • . Delisman

    (Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.)

  • Muhammad Yusuf

    (Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.)

  • Denny Prasetya

    (Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.)

  • Zenni Riana

    (Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.)

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to analyze the influence of auditor-related factors, namely independence, competence, and professional ethics, on audit quality at the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK) Representative Office of North Sumatra. It also examines the moderating role of public information disclosure in strengthening these relationships. Study Design: The research adopts a quantitative explanatory design to test causal relationships between variables and the moderating effect of public information disclosure. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at BPK Representative Office of North Sumatra, located in Medan, from April 2025 to July 2025. Methodology: Data were collected through questionnaires distributed to 156 auditors and employees involved in audit activities. The research employed Structural Equation Modeling with Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) to test validity, reliability, and hypothesis. Results: Findings indicate that auditor independence, competence, and professional ethics significantly influence audit quality. Public information disclosure significantly moderates the relationship between auditor independence and audit quality, strengthening the effect of independence. However, it does not moderate the influence of competence and professional ethics on audit quality. Conclusion: Audit quality at BPK North Sumatra is largely determined by internal auditor factors independence, competence, and ethics while public information disclosure plays a supportive role, particularly in reinforcing independence.

Suggested Citation

  • Rumi Friska Sitanggang & Lia May Sarah Ginting & . Delisman & Muhammad Yusuf & Denny Prasetya & Zenni Riana, 2025. "Audit Quality at BPK North Sumatra: Analysis of the Influence of Auditor Factors and Moderating Public Information Disclosure," Post-Print hal-05271670, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05271670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05271670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.