IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05262162.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Portfolio optimisation under prospect theory with an empirical test

Author

Listed:
  • N. Sensoy
  • S. Sozekici
  • H. Sak

    (Audencia Business School)

Abstract

Barberis et al. (2016. "Prospect Theory and Stock Returns: An Empirical Test." The Review of Financial Studies 29:3068–3107. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw049.) show that a stock whose past return distribution has a high (low) prospect theory value (TK) earns a low (high) subsequent return on average. In this paper, we investigate whether portfolio optimisation techniques can make high-TK stocks (both long and short positions) more appealing to investors. Following the literature, we remove the probability distortion part of prospect theory to find a closed-form solution under the well-justified assumptions of a piecewise exponential value function and normally distributed returns for multiple risky assets in a single-period setting. We show that the optimal portfolio is proportional to the well-known Markowitz mean–variance portfolio. Our numerical results demonstrate that our portfolio optimisation approach yields higher subsequent gains for groups of stocks with high TK and lower gains for those with low TK in the US market. TK at the portfolio level is an important driver of portfolio returns under our optimisation approach, even after controlling for well-established stock return predictors, and it negatively affects portfolio returns.

Suggested Citation

  • N. Sensoy & S. Sozekici & H. Sak, 2025. "Portfolio optimisation under prospect theory with an empirical test," Post-Print hal-05262162, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05262162
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2025.2553048
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05262162v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05262162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.