IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05253326.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Advertiser-friendly production? A longitudinal study of supplied content diversity on YouTube

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Rasskazova

    (ACT - Analyse des Crises et Transitions - LABEX ICCA - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UPCité - Université Paris Cité - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, LABEX ICCA - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UPCité - Université Paris Cité - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord)

Abstract

YouTube is the second most visited website in the world with an average of 29.6 billion monthly visits and the largest online content repository with 500 hours of videos being uploaded per minute. Its popularity in the cultural industries has drawn the attentions of researchers to provide an overall characterization of YouTube's landscape from its users (creators and audience) to the available videos (Bärtl 2018, Rieder et al. 2020, Ørmen and Gregersen 2022, McGrady et al. 2023)). However, very little is known about the advertisers' influence in online creative work (Poell et al. 2021, Joseph and Bishop 2024). To run its operation, YouTube heavily relies on revenues generated by selling advertising spaces on the website. This creates an opportunity for advertisers to exercise an economic influence in platforms' governance, i.e. in their design and action decisions (Griffin 2023). This influence was observed after the multiple massive departures of advertisers from the platform between 2017 and 2019. In order to retain brands, the platform introduced new moderation rules affecting users' ability to monetise published content. This example resonates with the works in traditional media economics. With their theoretical model, Anderson and Gabszewicz (2006) found that the production of cultural goods is "shaped by the desire to offer advertisers a vehicle that reaches as many prospective consumers as possible". This logic impacts the characteristics of supplied goods and media firms tend to cater the taste of the majority of the audience. Contrary to traditional media, YouTube does not own nor produce the videos. The content is provided by third-parties: amateurs and professional content creators. Yet, the interplay of the three sides (audience, creators, brands) determines the magnitude of supplied content (Bhargava 2021). This research explores the ways in which advertiser-friendly moderation policies have an influence on content production and provision strategies. How does the supply of user-generated content evolve in regards to YouTube's advertiser-friendly policies? In order to answer to this question, this research relies on a large-scale sample of 34,876,723 videos uploaded on YouTube by 81,963 channels between January 2016 and September 2019. This large sample is extracted from YouNiverse dataset which gathers information of more than 136,000 English-speaking YouTube channels (Ribeiro and West 2021). Three massive brands boycotts happened over the period: in March and November 2017 and in Febuary 2019. To characterize the evolution of content supply, three distinct analytical directions are selected: videos count, videos' duration and used keywords.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Rasskazova, 2025. "Advertiser-friendly production? A longitudinal study of supplied content diversity on YouTube," Post-Print hal-05253326, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05253326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05253326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.