IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05249521.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Carbon farming: The foundation for carbon farming schemes – lessons learned from 160 European schemes
[Agriculture carbone : les fondements des programmes d'agriculture carbone – enseignements tirés de 160 programmes européens]

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe

    (Department of Agroecology - Aarhus University [Aarhus])

  • Ennio Facq

    (Social Sciences Unit - ILVO - Research Institute for Agricultural, Fisheries and Food)

  • Irene Criscuoli

    (CREA Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy)

  • Laura Martínez-García

    (Experimental Station of Aula Dei, Department of Plant Nutrition - CSIC - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas [España] = Spanish National Research Council [Spain])

  • Claudia Heidecke

    (Coordination Unit Climate, Soil, Biodiversity - Thuenen-Institute)

  • Leonardo Amthauer Gallardo

    (Coordination Unit Climate, Soil, Biodiversity - Thuenen-Institute)

  • Andrea Martelli

    (CREA Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy)

  • Nikolas Hagemann

    (Agroscope, Ithaka Insitute)

  • Bert Smit

    (Wageningen Social & Economic Research)

  • Jennie van Der Kolk

    (Wageningen Environmental Science)

  • Francesco Galioto

    (CREA Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy)

  • Stephane de Cara

    (UMR PSAE - Paris-Saclay Applied Economics - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Jana Poláková

    (Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources - CZU - Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)

  • Morten Graversgaard

    (Department of Agroecology - Aarhus University [Aarhus])

Abstract

Enhancing carbon sequestration while maintaining and improving the soil ecosystem services of agricultural soils, including managed peatland, is an important lever for mitigating climate change in the Land-Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry sector. This can be achieved through the application of a mix of agricultural practices that may reward farmers in a green business model, often referred to as carbon farming (CF). To ensure the credibility of CF and acceptance among farmers, investors, and policymakers, there is a need to design CF schemes that enable the effective implementation of such practices across Europe. The objective of this study is to explore the design of existing CF schemes in relation to quantifying carbon removal, ensuring additionality, long-term storage, and sustainability. Further, to discuss the implications for the design and implementation of CF schemes in Europe, including the basis and potential for developing results-based CF schemes. Our analysis is based on an inventory of 160 CF schemes implemented across Europe, and an in-depth assessment of 40 of them. A majority of the schemes we identify are found in Northwestern Europe and are activity-based schemes funded by public expenditure. Further, across schemes, we observe substantial differences in the quality of the carbon removal due to different measures supported, documentation requirements, and years of carbon storage. While result-based schemes provide farmers with a direct incentive to increase carbon sequestration and are emphasized as an important policy objective, our analysis documents that currently, most existing CF schemes in Europe use activity-based incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe & Ennio Facq & Irene Criscuoli & Laura Martínez-García & Claudia Heidecke & Leonardo Amthauer Gallardo & Andrea Martelli & Nikolas Hagemann & Bert Smit & Jennie van Der Kolk, 2025. "Carbon farming: The foundation for carbon farming schemes – lessons learned from 160 European schemes [Agriculture carbone : les fondements des programmes d'agriculture carbone – enseignements tiré," Post-Print hal-05249521, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05249521
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05249521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.