IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05248048.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Emissions pricing instruments with intermittent renewables: Second-best policy

Author

Listed:
  • Nandeeta Neerunjun

    (GAEL - Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

Abstract

I analyze emissions pricing to support the integration of prevailing renewable resources into an electricity mix composed of polluting technologies. I consider the intermittent nature of the resources such as wind energy and externalities due to emissions-intensive production. I show that an emissions tax is inefficient when consumers are on flat-rate electricity tariffs and do not necessarily adapt their consumption to varying production. The tax is inefficient even with flexibility in the markets when consumers are on variable tariffs. The renewable resource induces variability in the polluting electricity production and associated marginal damage that is not efficiently internalized by a predetermined tax. I then study an Emissions Trading Scheme that provides flexibility at the policy level: emissions permits are traded at market prices. Since the emissions cap must still be predetermined, I show that it leads to inefficient permit prices as they do not match the marginal damages. The two emissions pricing instruments are not necessarily equivalent since I find that the tax differs from the prices of permits.

Suggested Citation

  • Nandeeta Neerunjun, 2026. "Emissions pricing instruments with intermittent renewables: Second-best policy," Post-Print hal-05248048, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05248048
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05248048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.