IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05247093.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Building Safe Online Spaces: How Collective Identity Shapes Psychological Safety in OCoPs

Author

Listed:
  • Ribhu Misra

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes, UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • Sabine Carton

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • Emilie Hoareau

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

Abstract

Online communities of practice (OCoPs) facilitate learning and knowledge sharing among members, but their success depends on psychological safety (PS) – a shared perception of safety for interpersonal risk-taking. In OCoPs, PS is often compromised due to geographic dispersion and weakened social bonds which can reduce trust and cohesion. This study explores how community collective identity, or members' shared sense of belonging, identity and purpose, influences PS. It also examines three factors – community collective efficacy, community distinctiveness, and inclusive leadership – as potential moderators enhancing this relationship. We argue that community collective identity positively influences PS by enhancing solidarity, reducing conflicts, and promoting collaboration which are critical for creating a psychologically safe environment. To explore these relationships, the study surveys OCoP members from three enterprises using validated scales. Data will be analyzed with structural equation modeling (SEM-PLS) to better understand how to enhance PS in OCoPs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ribhu Misra & Sabine Carton & Emilie Hoareau, 2025. "Building Safe Online Spaces: How Collective Identity Shapes Psychological Safety in OCoPs," Post-Print hal-05247093, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05247093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05247093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.