IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05241922.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Effectiveness Of Fear And Anger Appeals In Prevention Messages

Author

Listed:
  • Cécile Colin

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Olivier Droulers

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The study of fear appeals efficacy in public health communication has been ongoing for more than half a century and fear appeals remain a persuasive tactic frequently used in prevention such as tobacco control. Recently researchers have been interested in studying emotion combinations on health message effectiveness. To go into the study of the influence of emotion combinations in prevention in depth, this research focuses on the effect of the combination of anger and fear on anti-smoking messages effectiveness. Through one study, we compared the effect of a "fear and anger" message with a "fear" message (without anger) on the intention to reduce cigarette consumption. The first result of the experiment showed that exposure to the fearful and angry message led to a stronger intention to reduce cigarette consumption than exposure to the fearful message. Besides, additional results highlighted that the fearful message did not elicit fear only. These results are especially discussed regarding their interest in the study of the influence of emotion combinations on the effectiveness of fear appeals and, more broadly, of health messages.

Suggested Citation

  • Cécile Colin & Olivier Droulers, 2018. "The Effectiveness Of Fear And Anger Appeals In Prevention Messages," Post-Print hal-05241922, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05241922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05241922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.