IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05196645.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trust, but Verify : Managerial Ability and Conditional Accounting Conservatism

Author

Listed:
  • Shibashish Mukherjee

    (EM - EMLyon Business School)

  • Shuo Wang
  • Mustafa Reha Okur

Abstract

High-ability managers' performance track records and "integrity" culture foster capital providers' trust and reduce career risks, allowing them to set the firm's financial reporting policies. Employing this discretion, high-ability managers are likely to report less conditionally conservative earnings. Data from S&P 1500 U.S. firms between 1996 and 2017 support this conjecture. Additional analysis continues to suggest that high-ability managers lower conditional accounting conservatism under limited boundary conditions. We also document that some high-ability managers misuse their financial reporting discretion opportunistically. Despite this, using a two-stage method, we show that our proposed theoretical mechanism—firms with a stronger corporate integrity culture, which promotes trust—enables high-ability managers to report less conditionally conservatively. This study contributes to the research on accounting conservatism and managerial behavior, cautioning capital providers against placing excessive trust in high-ability managers, as in some cases, that trust has been found to be misplaced.

Suggested Citation

  • Shibashish Mukherjee & Shuo Wang & Mustafa Reha Okur, 2025. "Trust, but Verify : Managerial Ability and Conditional Accounting Conservatism," Post-Print hal-05196645, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05196645
    DOI: 10.2308/HORIZONS-2023-168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05196645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.