IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05181618.html

Outcome Trajectory Evaluation (OTE): An approach to tackle research-for-development's long-causal-chain problem

Author

Listed:
  • Boru Douthwaite
  • Claudio Proietti

    (Cirad-Dgdrs-Dims - Cirad-Dgdrs-Direction de l'impact et du Marketing de la Science - Cirad-Dgdrs - Direction Générale Déléguée à la Recherche et à la Stratégie - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement)

  • Vivian Polar

    (CIP - Centre international de la pomme de terre)

  • Graham Thiele

    (CIP - Centre international de la pomme de terre)

Abstract

This paper develops a novel approach called Outcome Trajectory Evaluation (OTE) in response to the long-causal-chain problem confronting the evaluation of research for development (R4D) projects. OTE strives to tackle four issues resulting from the common practice of evaluating R4D projects based on theory of change developed at the start. The approach was developed iteratively while conducting four evaluations of policy-related outcomes claimed by the CGIAR, a global R4D organization. The first step is to use a middle-range theory (MRT), based on "grand" social science theory, to help delineate and understand the trajectory that generated the set of outcomes being evaluated. The second step is to then identify project contribution to that trajectory. Other types of theory-driven evaluation are single step: they model how projects achieve outcomes without first considering the overarching causal mechanism—the outcome trajectory—from which the outcomes emerged. The use of an MRT allowed us to accrue learning from one evaluation to the next.

Suggested Citation

  • Boru Douthwaite & Claudio Proietti & Vivian Polar & Graham Thiele, 2023. "Outcome Trajectory Evaluation (OTE): An approach to tackle research-for-development's long-causal-chain problem," Post-Print hal-05181618, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05181618
    DOI: 10.1177/10982140221122771
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05181618v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05181618v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10982140221122771?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian M Belcher & Karl Hughes, 2021. "Understanding and evaluating the impact of integrated problem-oriented research programmes: Concepts and considerations," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(2), pages 154-168.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johnson, N., 2021. "Measuring the impact of integrated systems research: promising approaches and why CGIAR needs to care," IWMI Books, Reports H050911, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Marina Apgar & Mieke Snijder & Grace Lyn Higdon & Sylvia Szabo, 2023. "Evaluating Research for Development: Innovation to Navigate Complexity," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(2), pages 241-259, April.
    3. Cian O’Donovan & Aleksandra (Ola) Michalec & Joshua R Moon, 2022. "Capabilities for transdisciplinary research," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 145-158.
    4. Johnson, N., "undated". "Measuring the impact of integrated systems research: promising approaches and why CGIAR needs to care," IWMI Reports 329155, International Water Management Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05181618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.