IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05180950.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On-farm agricultural inputs and changing boundaries: Innovations around production of microorganisms in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Frédéric Goulet

    (UMR Innovation - Innovation et Développement dans l'Agriculture et l'Alimentation - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement)

Abstract

A growing number of activities formerly undertaken off-farm are now carried out on-farm, including product processing, agronomic experimentation or animal slaughter. This also applies to the production of certain agricultural inputs, including micro-organisms used as alternatives to chemical inputs in plant nutrition and health. Based on a case study in Brazil, this article analyses the mechanisms behind this shift in the production of inputs, particularly the way it challenges the boundaries that usually delimit the skills and activities of farmers, agri-supply companies and agricultural research. It highlights the boundary work they undertook to extend or, on the contrary, to preserve their prerogatives and competences. Economic, political and epistemic issues are at stake around these boundaries and their movements, and the stakeholders involved defend contrasted positions. The results show that the shift of certain activities towards the farm, which is often seen as an important lever in agroecological transitions, is a complex process and can cause major tensions among stakeholders. Il also shows that, despite these movements, the on-farm production of nature-based solutions and bio-based technologies like microorganisms only partially call the organisation and trajectory of agro-industrial systems into question. In conclusion, the article calls for reflection on the role of agri-supply companies in the transformation of agricultural technological systems. It also calls for research into the control of the technologies produced on farm, and into the ways in which the State can transform existing systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Frédéric Goulet, 2023. "On-farm agricultural inputs and changing boundaries: Innovations around production of microorganisms in Brazil," Post-Print hal-05180950, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05180950
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103070
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05180950v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05180950v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric von Hippel, 1986. "Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(7), pages 791-805, July.
    2. Lee‐Ann Sutherland & Pierre Labarthe, 2022. "Should ‘Impartial’ Advice be a Priority of European Agricultural and Rural Policies?," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(1), pages 15-22, April.
    3. Morgan Meyer, 2013. "Domesticating and democratizing science: a geography of do-it-yourself biology," CSI Working Papers Series 032, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech.
    4. Sone Ekman & Hans Andersson, 1998. "The economics of on‐farm processing: model development and an empirical analysis," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 18(2), pages 177-189, March.
    5. Geels, Frank W. & Schot, Johan, 2007. "Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 399-417, April.
    6. Frédéric Goulet, 2021. "Biological inputs and agricultural policies in South America: between disruptive innovation and continuity," Post-Print cirad-03236912, HAL.
    7. J.-P. Vergne & Tyler Wry, 2014. "Categorizing Categorization Research: Review, Integration, and Future Directions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 56-94, January.
    8. Ekman, Sone & Andersson, Hans, 1998. "The economics of on-farm processing: model development and an empirical analysis," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 18(2), pages 177-189, March.
    9. Tom MacMillan & Tim G. Benton, 2014. "Agriculture: Engage farmers in research," Nature, Nature, vol. 509(7498), pages 25-27, May.
    10. Wu, Qiang & He, Qile, 2020. "DIY Laboratories and business innovation ecosystems: The case of pharmaceutical industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Steinke, Jonathan & Ortiz-Crespo, Berta & van Etten, Jacob & Müller, Anna, 2022. "Participatory design of digital innovation in agricultural research-for-development: insights from practice," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Deborah Merrill-Sands & Marie-Hélène Collion, 1994. "Farmers and researchers: The road to partnership," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 11(2), pages 26-37, March.
    13. Vanloqueren, Gaëtan & Baret, Philippe V., 2008. "Why are ecological, low-input, multi-resistant wheat cultivars slow to develop commercially? A Belgian agricultural 'lock-in' case study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(2-3), pages 436-446, June.
    14. Sara Boettiger & Brian D. Wright, 2006. "Open Source in Biotechnology: Open Questions Innovations Case Discussion: CAMBIA-BiOS," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 1(4), pages 45-57, October.
    15. Douthwaite, B. & Keatinge, J. D. H. & Park, J. R., 2002. "Learning selection: an evolutionary model for understanding, implementing and evaluating participatory technology development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 109-131, May.
    16. Sumberg, James, 2005. "Systems of innovation theory and the changing architecture of agricultural research in Africa," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 21-41, February.
    17. Stefan, Ioana & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, Pia & Vanhaverbeke, Wim & Oikarinen, Eeva-Liisa, 2022. "The dark side of open innovation: Individual affective responses as hidden tolls of the paradox of openness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 360-373.
    18. Henning Best, 2008. "Organic agriculture and the conventionalization hypothesis: A case study from West Germany," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 25(1), pages 95-106, January.
    19. Williams, Robin & Edge, David, 1996. "The social shaping of technology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 865-899, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frédéric Goulet & Simon Fonteyne & Santiago López Ridaura & Paulo Niederle & Sylvanus Odjo & Sergio Schneider & Nele Verhulst & Jelle Van Loon, 2025. "The emergence of microbiological inputs and the challenging laboratorisation of agriculture: lessons from Brazil and Mexico," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(1), pages 369-381, March.
    2. Gruber, Mario, 2020. "An evolutionary perspective on adoption-diffusion theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 535-541.
    3. Sebatta, Christopher & Mugisha, Johnny & Katungi, Enid & Kasharu, Apolo K. & Kyomugisha, Harriet, 2014. "Adding Value at the Farm: The Case of Smallholder Potato Farmers in the Highlands of Uganda," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 4(3).
    4. Michael Rennings & Philipp Baaden & Carolin Block & Marcus John & Stefanie Bröring, 2024. "Assessing emerging sustainability-oriented technologies: the case of precision agriculture," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(6), pages 2969-2998, June.
    5. Qiu, Yixin & Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Arndt, Félix & Ng, Wilson, 2023. "Microfoundations and dynamics of do-it-yourself ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Edwin Nuijten & Monika M. Messmer & Edith T. Lammerts van Bueren, 2016. "Concepts and Strategies of Organic Plant Breeding in Light of Novel Breeding Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Véronique De Herde & Kevin Maréchal & Philippe V. Baret, 2019. "Lock-ins and Agency: Towards an Embedded Approach of Individual Pathways in the Walloon Dairy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. repec:plo:pone00:0229910 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Lacombe, Camille & Couix, Nathalie & Hazard, Laurent, 2018. "Designing agroecological farming systems with farmers: A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 208-220.
    10. Tom Dedeurwaerdere & Olivier De Schutter & E Mathijs & Marek Hudon & Sibylle Bui & Ionara Da Costa & Ana Alicia Dipierri & Paula Fernández-Wulff & Hélène Joachain & Tijtske Anna Zwart, 2018. "Food4Sustainability: Collective action for sustainable food systems in a changing climate: assessing social experimentations and policy innovations," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/317131, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Jeppesen, Jakob & Bandsholm, Jesper & Asmussen, Joakim & Balachandran, Rakulan & Vestergaard, Simon & Andersen, Thomas Hauerslev & Sørensen, Thomas Klode & Bjørn-Thygesen, Fran, 2017. "Navigating the “paradox of openness” in energy and transport innovation: Insights from eight corporate clean technology research and development case studies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 236-245.
    12. Boon, Wouter P.C. & Moors, Ellen H.M. & Meijer, Albert J., 2014. "Exploring dynamics and strategies of niche protection," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 792-803.
    13. Trèves, Viviane & Hannachi, Mourad & Meynard, Jean-Marc, 2025. "Enhancing capacities for sustainability transition policy design: Lessons from French pesticide reduction plans," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    14. Siebeling, T. & Romijn, H.A., 2005. "Why People Contribute Voluntarily to Innovation: Insights from South Africa 's Siyabuswa Educational Improvement & Development Trust," Working Papers 05.13, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    15. Nicholson, Charles F. & Stephenson, Mark W., 2006. "Financial Performance and Other Characteristics of On-Farm Dairy Processing Enterprises in New York, Vermont and Wisconsin," Research Bulletins 121583, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    16. Massaro, Sebastiano & Lorenzoni, Gianni, 2021. "Nanomedicine: a socio-technical system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    17. Sardo, Stefania & Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M., 2025. "Technology discontinuation as a continuous process: diesel, sustainability, and the politics of delay," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(4).
    18. Galli, Francesca & Prosperi, Paolo & Favilli, Elena & D'Amico, Simona & Bartolini, Fabio & Brunori, Gianluca, 2020. "How can policy processes remove barriers to sustainable food systems in Europe? Contributing to a policy framework for agri-food transitions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    19. Cheng Wang & Tao Lv & Rongjiang Cai & Jianfeng Xu & Liya Wang, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Multi-Level Perspective on Sustainability Transition Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-31, March.
    20. Bolton, Ronan & Foxon, Timothy J., 2015. "Infrastructure transformation as a socio-technical process — Implications for the governance of energy distribution networks in the UK," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB), pages 538-550.
    21. Claude Paraponaris, 2017. "Plateformes numériques, conception ouverte et emploi," Post-Print halshs-01614430, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05180950. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.