IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05168124.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stock Market Performance Prediction: A Comparative Study Between Econometric Models and Artificial Intelligence-Based Models
[Prédiction de la performance boursière, une étude comparative entre modélisations économétriques et modélisations basées sur l’intelligence artificielle]

Author

Listed:
  • Manel Labidi

    (LEVIATAN)

  • Ying Zhang

    (LEVIATAN)

  • Matthieu Petit Guillaume

    (BH - Beyond Horizon - BH - Beyond Horizon)

  • Aurélien Krauth

    (LEVIATAN)

Abstract

In this article, we present a comparative study of the performance of econometric models (Mundlak model and GEE-Logit model) and artificial intelligence based models, such as stacking model and ensemble model integrating XG-Boost and LightGBM, as well as deep learning models (LSTM, GRU, Transformer-based encoder-decoder, TCN) in a classification task of listed securities into underperfor- ming and outperforming stocks, with a one-year investment horizon. We use annual historical data from 2019 to 2021. The results show that a stacking classification model out-performs the other models and offers a better balance between the true positive rate (70%) and the true negative rate (67%).

Suggested Citation

  • Manel Labidi & Ying Zhang & Matthieu Petit Guillaume & Aurélien Krauth, 2025. "Stock Market Performance Prediction: A Comparative Study Between Econometric Models and Artificial Intelligence-Based Models [Prédiction de la performance boursière, une étude comparative entre mod," Post-Print hal-05168124, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05168124
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05168124v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05168124v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05168124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.