IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05166142.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Advancing Quantitative Risk Assessment for CO₂ Geological Storage: Experience from the PilotStrategy project

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Le Guénan

    (BRGM - Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières)

Abstract

Effective risk management is essential for the safe and responsible deployment of CO₂ geological storage. Within the PilotSTRATEGY project, dedicated efforts are underway to move beyond traditional qualitative approaches and implement quantitative risk assessment methods across multiple prospective storage sites. This poster presents the rationale for this methodological shift, outlines the challenges encountered, and shares early insights from the ongoing work. Quantitative methods offer the potential for more transparent, reproducible, and decision-relevant risk evaluations. However, their implementation in the context of CO₂ storage presents significant hurdles, including data limitations, uncertainty quantification, and the integration of complex geological and operational models. Through this work, we aim to demonstrate that while qualitative assessments remain valuable, they are insufficient on their own for supporting high-stakes decisions about storage site development and operation. The poster will foster discussion around the practicalities of adopting quantitative risk frameworks, the types of decisions they can support, and the conditions under which they add the most value. By sharing lessons learned and open questions, we hope to contribute to a more rigorous and actionable approach to risk management in CO₂ storage.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Le Guénan, 2025. "Advancing Quantitative Risk Assessment for CO₂ Geological Storage: Experience from the PilotStrategy project," Post-Print hal-05166142, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05166142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05166142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.