IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05155128.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Can we confirm the role of trust, ideology and risk perception in attitudes to vaccination? (ESS 10 and CRONOS 2 data)

Author

Listed:
  • Agnalys Michaud

    (CDSP - Centre de données socio-politiques de Sciences Po (Sciences Po, CNRS) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of public attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination by leveraging data from the European Social Survey (ESS Round 10) and the CRONOS 2 panel. Building on existing literature, it examines the role of trust (in scientists, citizens, and institutions), political ideology, sensitivity to conspiracy theories, and satisfaction with governmental pandemic management. The analysis further explores how social norms and individual risk perceptions influence vaccination attitudes and compliance with protective measures. Multivariate models confirm the significant impact of trust in scientists and conspiracy sensitivity. Additionally, CRONOS 2 data highlights the importance of perceived vulnerability and the influence of descriptive social norms. The study also finds a strong consistency in responses across different survey modes. These findings underscore the multifaceted and context-dependent nature of vaccine attitudes and demonstrate the value of probabilistic longitudinal panels in capturing them.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnalys Michaud, 2024. "Can we confirm the role of trust, ideology and risk perception in attitudes to vaccination? (ESS 10 and CRONOS 2 data)," Post-Print hal-05155128, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05155128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05155128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.