IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05150032.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Discourse-Practice Interplay: Uncovering Colonial Fingerprints in Business-NGO Partnerships

Author

Listed:
  • Xenia Becker

    (EESC-GEM Grenoble Ecole de Management)

  • Lea Stadtler

    (EESC-GEM Grenoble Ecole de Management)

Abstract

Businesses play an integral role in global development work. However, recent studies highlight the persistent risk of companies adopting Eurocentric approaches in their projects, even when working alongside local stakeholders. While this risk has been identified, it remains unclear why and how such Eurocentric approaches emerge and prevail in often well-intended projects. Through an in-depth case study of a European company's partnership that aimed at improving water access to an ‘underserved' community in India, we illustrate how Eurocentric patterns emerged via a complex interplay between discourse and material practices at various project stages. The corporate actors became deeply entrenched in this approach with diverse shields preventing exposure to alternative development views. By grounding these insights into postcolonial and decolonial perspectives as interconnected sociologies, we introduce the concept of colonial fingerprints as an analytical tool to uncover Eurocentric approaches that prevent companies from creating sustainable development impact. We discuss the ethical implications of our work, emphasizing the need to view corporate development efforts in a historical context and to use partnership engagements as opportunities for learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Xenia Becker & Lea Stadtler, 2024. "Discourse-Practice Interplay: Uncovering Colonial Fingerprints in Business-NGO Partnerships," Post-Print hal-05150032, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05150032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05150032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.