IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05126659.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Acceptability Of Artificial Intelligence By General Practitioners: Analysis Of Affordances And Paradoxes In The Screening Of Neurodegenerative Diseases

Author

Listed:
  • Mehdi Berrahou

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Cathy Krohmer

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Johanna Habib

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

  • Bruno Ventelou

    (AMSE - Aix-Marseille Sciences Economiques - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - ECM - École Centrale de Marseille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Aims: This study analyses the acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI) to general practitioners, particularly in the early detection of neurodegenerative diseases. Methods: An exploratory qualitative method was adopted, with nine semi-directive interviews conducted with doctors, interns and an AI designer. Analysis of the data produced a coding grid structured around an original theoretical framework in information systems (IS) that combines the concepts of affordances and paradoxes, concepts that are commonly used in Management Sciences to understand technology adoption. Results: The results show that doctors have ambivalent perceptions of AI. Positive affordances include the reduction of errors, improved efficiency and support for complex diagnoses. AI is also seen as an opportunity to democratize medical knowledge, make practice more accessible, and improve productivity by allowing more patients to be treated in less time. However, the negative affordances raise several concerns, such as the biases that could affect the decision-making process, the loss of skills, increased dependence on technology, as well as the dehumanization of the doctor-patient relationship and the question of responsibility in the event of error. The study also identifies several paradoxes. For example, AI can both reduce and increase errors or improve skills while running the risk of degrading them because of technological dependence. These paradoxes are key to understanding the dynamics of AI acceptability. Conclusions: The research shows the importance of involving healthcare professionals in the development of AI solutions, improving their technical training and developing new affordances that can overcome paradoxes. By integrating affordances and paradoxes, it proposes an original theoretical framework for studying the integration of AI in general medicine. Future studies should extend the sample to obtain new insights.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehdi Berrahou & Cathy Krohmer & Johanna Habib & Bruno Ventelou, 2025. "Acceptability Of Artificial Intelligence By General Practitioners: Analysis Of Affordances And Paradoxes In The Screening Of Neurodegenerative Diseases," Post-Print hal-05126659, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05126659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05126659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.