IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05114445.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Marketing Efficiency in Cut Roses: A Comparative Study of Organised Vis-A-Vis Unorganised Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Vidhyashree, H.S.

    (Karnataka State Rural Development and Panchayat Raj University, Gadag, Karnataka, India.)

  • Santhosha, K. M.

    (Karnataka State Rural Development and Panchayat Raj University, Gadag, Karnataka, India.)

  • Ganeshagouda I Patil

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkote, India.)

  • C. G Yadava

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkote, India.)

  • Gagana, M. D.

    (College of Agriculture, Hassan, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, India.)

  • Ramappa, K. B

    (ADRTC, Institute of Social and Economic Changes (ISEC), Bengaluru, India.)

  • Srinivasalu G. B.

    (College of Horticulture, University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkote, India.)

  • . Raghavendra

    (Department of Computer Sciences, University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkote, India.)

Abstract

The present study is mainly about the comparative analysis of marketing efficiency of cut roses under organised and unorganised markets. For the present study, the primary data was collected from the Krishna Raja Market, Bengaluru an unorganised market, whereas the International Flower Auction Centre, Bengaluru (IFAB) is an organised market. Data collected from 40 market intermediaries in each market structure and total intermediaries were to be 80. Forty rose vendors are randomly selected to gather marketing constraints in organised market. In the study area, three major marketing channels were observed for cut rose marketing in unorganised market structure: Channel I: Producer – Wholesaler – Retailer – Consumer; Channel II: Producer – Retailer – Consumer; and Channel III: Producer– Commission agent– Retailer – Consumer, whereas in the organised market, two marketing channels were prominent, i.e., Channel I: Producer – IFAB – Wholesaler – Retailer – Consumer and Channel II: Producer – IFAB – Retailer – Consumer. Marketing efficiency was estimated using the Acharya and Agarwal methodology. In this analysis, direct marketing channel was found to be the most efficient for unorganised and organised markets. Marketing constraints were analysed using Rank Based Quotient (RBQ) technique. Quality standards and the lack of price information were the most important problems for the farmers while marketing the flowers in organised markets rather than unorganised markets. Hence, policymakers should provide producers with the required facilities and impart proper knowledge about quality standards to farmers, leading to more income for producers.

Suggested Citation

  • Vidhyashree, H.S. & Santhosha, K. M. & Ganeshagouda I Patil & C. G Yadava & Gagana, M. D. & Ramappa, K. B & Srinivasalu G. B. & . Raghavendra, 2024. "Marketing Efficiency in Cut Roses: A Comparative Study of Organised Vis-A-Vis Unorganised Markets," Post-Print hal-05114445, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05114445
    DOI: 10.9734/acri/2024/v24i5713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05114445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.