Author
Listed:
- Ali-Momoh Betty Oluwayemisi
(Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management Science, Federal University of Oye Ekiti, Ekiti-State, Nigeria.)
- Ajayi Adeniyi Rachael
(Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management Science, Federal University of Oye Ekiti, Ekiti-State, Nigeria.)
- Obelewaji Oluwatosin Damilola
(Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management Science, Federal University of Oye Ekiti, Ekiti-State, Nigeria.)
- Adesina Oluwakemi Oyebola
(Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management Science, Federal University of Oye Ekiti, Ekiti-State, Nigeria.)
- Foalranmi Timothy Ayofe
(Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management Science, Federal University of Oye Ekiti, Ekiti-State, Nigeria.)
- Abimbola Akinkunmi Opeyemi
(Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management Science, Federal University of Oye Ekiti, Ekiti-State, Nigeria.)
- Azeez Mohammed Adekunle
(Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management Science, Federal University of Oye Ekiti, Ekiti-State, Nigeria.)
- John Achile Abutu
(Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management Science, Federal University of Oye Ekiti, Ekiti-State, Nigeria.)
- Oladipo Olarewaju
(Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management Science, Federal University of Oye Ekiti, Ekiti-State, Nigeria.)
Abstract
This study evaluates the applicability of traditional cost theory in circular economy accounting practices. The design and method adopted involve a case study of three states (Edo, Ondo and Ekiti), Benin Electricity Distribution Company (BEDC) electricity companies, putting cost theory into consideration, who created a value network for creating and implementing an innovative packaging solution by circular economy concepts. Content analysis was employed to explore the accounting tools employed. The findings indicate that innovation and circular solutions are found in new structural configurations in terms of value networks. In addition, managers' decision process completely avoided passing through the accounting function; they used informal accounting and life cycle analysis, which ensured a multi-stakeholder dialogue from the life cycle approach. The theoretical and practical implications of the study are concerned with management accounting systems' effectiveness in supporting organisations pursuing circular solutions, on which cost theory is based. The study concluded that in accounting for the circular economy, traditional cost theory does not apply well, especially in fast-changing technology-driven industries such as electricity distribution, as the traditional mechanisms of costs are unable to account for the complexities of circular value generation and lifecycle sustainability. Also, finding that managers of BEDC electricity companies use informal accounting and life cycle analysis over standard accounting practices. The study also illustrates a move towards a decentralized decision-making process in the management of circular economy projects. The study recommended that organizations such as utility companies, in particular of BEDC, should reorient their management accounting systems to include circular economy metrics such as life cycle costing, resource efficiency as a metric, and environmental impact assessments. On top of that, the accounting function needs to be brought back into the center of management decisions as a tool for ensuring cost considerations are in line with sustainability objectives and stakeholder demands and managers and accounting professionals need ongoing training in circular economy principles, sustainability accounting, and using innovative tools like life cycle analysis and environmental management accounting.
Suggested Citation
Ali-Momoh Betty Oluwayemisi & Ajayi Adeniyi Rachael & Obelewaji Oluwatosin Damilola & Adesina Oluwakemi Oyebola & Foalranmi Timothy Ayofe & Abimbola Akinkunmi Opeyemi & Azeez Mohammed Adekunle & John , 2025.
"Assessing the Relevance of Traditional Cost Theory in the Implementation of Circular Economy Accounting Practices: A Case Study of Benin Electricity Distribution Company PLC, Nigeria,"
Post-Print
hal-05112581, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05112581
DOI: 10.56557/arjocs/2025/v7i1141
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05112581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.